» Articles » PMID: 37240919

Review of Endometrial Receptivity Array: A Personalized Approach to Embryo Transfer and Its Clinical Applications

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37240919
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Successful outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) rely on both the formation of a chromosomally normal embryo and its implantation in a receptive endometrium. Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been widely accepted as a tool to assess the viability of an embryo. In 2011, the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) was first published as a tool to determine when the endometrium is most receptive to an embryo, commonly referred to as the "window of implantation" (WOI). The ERA uses molecular arrays to assess proliferation and differentiation in the endometrium and screens for inflammatory markers. Unlike PGT-A, there has been dissent within the field concerning the efficacy of the ERA. Many studies that contest the success of the ERA found that it did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with an already-good prognosis. Alternatively, studies that utilized the ERA in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and transfer of known euploid embryos demonstrated improved outcomes. This review aims to describe the ERA as a novel technique, review the various settings that the ERA may be used in, such as natural frozen embryo transfer (nFET) and hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET), and provide a summary of the recent clinical data for embryo transfers in patients with RIF utilizing the ERA.

Citing Articles

The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.

Xu S, Diao H, Xiong Y, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7326.

PMID: 40025209 PMC: 11873133. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91745-y.


Progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles: assays, circulating concentrations, metabolites, and molecular action.

Mandelbaum R, Stanczyk F F S Rep. 2024; 5(3):237-247.

PMID: 39381665 PMC: 11456646. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.05.007.


Endometrial E-cadherin and N-cadherin Expression during the Mid-Secretory Phase of Women with Ovarian Endometrioma or Uterine Fibroids.

Yun B, Yun N, Lee J, Go M, Jang H, Park J J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338174 PMC: 11433430. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090920.


A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Embryo Transfer: Advancements, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes.

Dahiphale S, Dewani D, Dahiphale J, Agrawal M, Dave A, Pajai S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67866.

PMID: 39328623 PMC: 11424594. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67866.


Adiponectin receptor 1 regulates endometrial receptivity via the adenosine monophosphate‑activated protein kinase/E‑cadherin pathway.

Sarankhuu B, Jeon H, Jeong D, Park S, Kim T, Lee S Mol Med Rep. 2024; 30(4).

PMID: 39155876 PMC: 11350624. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13308.


References
1.
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins G, Salem S, Liu X, Lyle S . Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012; 5(1):24. PMC: 3403960. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24. View

2.
Eisman L, Pisarska M, Wertheimer S, Chan J, Akopians A, Surrey M . Clinical utility of the endometrial receptivity analysis in women with prior failed transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(3):645-650. PMC: 7910393. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02041-9. View

3.
Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, Taylor B, Tallon N, Warraich G . The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(4):683-692. PMC: 5949105. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2. View

4.
Sekhon L, Feuerstein J, Pan S, Overbey J, Lee J, Briton-Jones C . Endometrial preparation before the transfer of single, vitrified-warmed, euploid blastocysts: does the duration of estradiol treatment influence clinical outcome?. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(6):1177-1185.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.024. View

5.
Agha-Hosseini M, Hashemi L, Aleyasin A, Ghasemi M, Sarvi F, Shabani Nashtaei M . Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 15(1):12-17. PMC: 5894530. DOI: 10.4274/tjod.47855. View