Whole-Genome Analysis of Individual Meiotic Events in Drosophila Melanogaster Reveals That Noncrossover Gene Conversions Are Insensitive to Interference and the Centromere Effect
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A century of genetic analysis has revealed that multiple mechanisms control the distribution of meiotic crossover events. In Drosophila melanogaster, two significant positional controls are interference and the strongly polar centromere effect. Here, we assess the factors controlling the distribution of crossovers (COs) and noncrossover gene conversions (NCOs) along all five major chromosome arms in 196 single meiotic divisions to generate a more detailed understanding of these controls on a genome-wide scale. Analyzing the outcomes of single meiotic events allows us to distinguish among different classes of meiotic recombination. In so doing, we identified 291 NCOs spread uniformly among the five major chromosome arms and 541 COs (including 52 double crossovers and one triple crossover). We find that unlike COs, NCOs are insensitive to the centromere effect and do not demonstrate interference. Although the positions of COs appear to be determined predominately by the long-range influences of interference and the centromere effect, each chromosome may display a different pattern of sensitivity to interference, suggesting that interference may not be a uniform global property. In addition, unbiased sequencing of a large number of individuals allows us to describe the formation of de novo copy number variants, the majority of which appear to be mediated by unequal crossing over between transposable elements. This work has multiple implications for our understanding of how meiotic recombination is regulated to ensure proper chromosome segregation and maintain genome stability.
The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.
Schwarzkopf E, Brandt N, Smukowski Heil C PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(2):e1011585.
PMID: 39937775 PMC: 11845044. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011585.
Mutation and recombination parameters in zebra finch are similar to those in mammals.
Prentout D, Bykova D, Hoge C, Hooper D, McDiarmid C, Wu F bioRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 39282267 PMC: 11398497. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.05.611523.
Schaeffer S, Richards S, Fuller Z G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 39073776 PMC: 11457094. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae176.
The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.
Schwarzkopf E, Brandt N, Smukowski Heil C bioRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 39026729 PMC: 11257466. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.04.574263.
Co-inheritance of recombined chromatids maintains heterozygosity in a parthenogenetic ant.
Lacy K, Hart T, Kronauer D Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(8):1522-1533.
PMID: 39014144 PMC: 11310076. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02455-z.