Can We Prevent a Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma by Using Larger Diameter Suction Drains?

Overview

Journal Clin Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2016 Mar 2

PMID 26929803

Citations 8

Authors

Dong Ki Ahn

Jin Hak Kim

Byung Kwon Chang

Jae Il Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Epidural hematoma is a rare but serious complication. According to previous studies, it is not prevented by suction drains. This study evaluated the following alternative hypothesis: the larger the diameter of a suction drain, the less the remaining epidural hematoma after spinal surgery.

Methods: This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion were divided into two groups: the large drain (LD, 2.8-mm-diameter tube) and small drain (SD, 1.6-mm-diameter tube) groups according to the diameter of the suction drains. All patients were consecutive and allocated alternately according to the date of operations. Suction drains were removed on day 3 and magnetic resonance imaging was performed on day 7 postoperatively. The size of remaining hematomas was measured by the degree of thecal sac compression in cross section using the following 4-point numeric scale: G1, less than one quarter; G2, between one quarter and half; G3, more than half; and G4, more than subtotal obstruction.

Results: There were 39 patients with LDs and 38 with SDs. They did not differ significantly in terms of sex, number of fusion segments, revision or not, antiplatelet medication, intraoperative injection of tranexamic acid. However, patient age differed significantly between the two groups (LD, 63.3 years and < SD, 68.6 years; p = 0.007). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet number, blood loss, or operation duration. However, platelet function analysis exhibited a significant difference (LD, 164.7 seconds and < SD, 222.3 seconds; p = 0.002). The two blinded readers showed high consistency (Kappa value = 0.740; p = 0.000). The results of reader 1 were as follows: LD and SD had 21 and 21 cases of G1, 9 and 11 cases of G2, 6 and 6 cases of G3, and 3 and 0 cases of G4, respectively. The results of reader 2 were as follows: LD and SD had 22 and 23 cases of G1, 7 and 9 cases of G2, 7 and 6 cases of G3, and 3 and 0 cases of G4, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups (reader 1, p = 0.636; reader 2, p = 0.466).

Conclusions: The alternative hypothesis was rejected. Therefore, postoperative spinal epidural hematoma would not be prevented by LD.

Citing Articles

Comparative study on the selection of drainage methods in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Wang C, Wang X, Yang Z, Shi J, Niu N BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):207.

PMID: 37480018 PMC: 10362626. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02106-3.

Negative versus natural drainage after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A prospective randomized study.

Elfiky T, Shehata R, Nafady M Brain Spine. 2023; 3:101709.

PMID: 37383464 PMC: 10293117. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.101709.

Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematoma after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A case report.

Xu W, Guo J, Zhu J, Zhao X, Yasaman I, Chen J Front Surg. 2022; 9:1005462.

PMID: 36225220 PMC: 9549240. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005462.

Is Routine Use of Drain Really Necessary for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery? A Retrospective Case Series with a Historical Control Group.

Jang H, Park S, Kim K, Kim E, Lee J, Choi S Global Spine J. 2021; 13(3):621-629.

PMID: 33733887 PMC: 10240607. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211001801.

Drainage after posterior single-level instrumented lumbar fusion: Natural pressure vs negative pressure.

Chen T, Chang H, Liu K, Shi M, Song C, Meng X Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(7):e19154.

PMID: 32049842 PMC: 7035085. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019154.

References

Awwad E, SMITH Jr K . MRI of marked dural sac compression by surgicel in the immediately postoperative period after uncomplicated lumbar laminectomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999; 23(6):969-75. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199911000-00029. View

Chimenti P, Molinari R . Post-operative spinal epidural hematoma causing American Spinal Injury Association B spinal cord injury in patients with suction wound drains. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013; 36(3):213-9. PMC: 3654447. DOI: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000070. View

Kou J, Fischgrund J, Biddinger A, Herkowitz H . Risk factors for spinal epidural hematoma after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(15):1670-3. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200208010-00016. View

Uribe J, Moza K, Jimenez O, Green B, Levi A . Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematomas. Spine J. 2003; 3(2):125-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00535-1. View

Brown M, Brookfield K . A randomized study of closed wound suction drainage for extensive lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(10):1066-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200405150-00003. View

Kebaish K, Awad J . Spinal epidural hematoma causing acute cauda equina syndrome. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(6):e1. View

Ross J, Masaryk T, Modic M, Bohlman H, Delamater R, Wilber G . Lumbar spine: postoperative assessment with surface-coil MR imaging. Radiology. 1987; 164(3):851-60. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615887. View

Montaldi S, Fankhauser H, Schnyder P, Tribolet N . Computed tomography of the postoperative intervertebral disc and lumbar spinal canal: investigation of twenty-five patients after successful operation for lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgery. 1988; 22(6 Pt 1):1014-22. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198806010-00007. View

Djukic S, Vahlensieck M, Resendes M, Genant H . The lumbar spine: postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Bildgebung. 1992; 59(3):136-46. View

10.

Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Erkintalo M, Helenius H, Valtonen S . Postoperative hematomas after successful lumbar microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Neurol. 1994; 41(2):98-105. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(94)90105-8. View

11.

Dina T, Boden S, DAVIS D . Lumbar spine after surgery for herniated disk: imaging findings in the early postoperative period. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164(3):665-71. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.164.3.7863890. View

12.

Lawton M, Porter R, Heiserman J, JACOBOWITZ R, Sonntag V, Dickman C . Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0001. View

13.

Scuderi G, Brusovanik G, Fitzhenry L, Vaccaro A . Is wound drainage necessary after lumbar spinal fusion surgery?. Med Sci Monit. 2005; 11(2):CR64-6. View

14.

Awad J, Kebaish K, Donigan J, Cohen D, Kostuik J . Analysis of the risk factors for the development of post-operative spinal epidural haematoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(9):1248-52. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.16518. View

15.

Mirzai H, Eminoglu M, Orguc S . Are drains useful for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, randomized clinical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006; 19(3):171-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000190560.20872.a7. View

16.

Yi S, Yoon D, Kim K, Kim S, Shin H . Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma: risk factor and clinical outcome. Yonsei Med J. 2006; 47(3):326-32. PMC: 2688151. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.3.326. View

17.

Ikuta K, Tono O, Tanaka T, Arima J, Nakano S, Sasaki K . Evaluation of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma after microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 5(5):404-9. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.5.404. View

18.

Parker M, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A . Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (3):CD001825. PMC: 8408575. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2. View

19.

Sokolowski M, Garvey T, Perl 2nd J, Sokolowski M, Cho W, Mehbod A . Prospective study of postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1):108-13. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39af. View

20.

Kanayama M, Oha F, Togawa D, Shigenobu K, Hashimoto T . Is closed-suction drainage necessary for single-level lumbar decompression?: review of 560 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(10):2690-4. PMC: 3049608. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1235-6. View