» Articles » PMID: 26909182

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: Incentivizing Open Research Practices Through Peer Review

Abstract

Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism-reviewers withholding comprehensive review-to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.

Citing Articles

Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.

Petersen I, Apfelbaum K, McMurray B Infant Child Dev. 2024; 33(1).

PMID: 38425545 PMC: 10904029. DOI: 10.1002/icd.2315.


Reproducibility in the Social Sciences.

Moody J, Keister L, Ramos M Annu Rev Sociol. 2023; 48(1):65-85.

PMID: 37284506 PMC: 10241466. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090221-035954.


Can You Hear What's Coming? Failure to Replicate ERP Evidence for Phonological Prediction.

Poulton V, Nieuwland M Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 3(4):556-574.

PMID: 37215344 PMC: 10158594. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00078.


Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science.

Munoz-Tamayo R, Nielsen B, Gagaoua M, Gondret F, Krause E, Morgavi D PNAS Nexus. 2023; 1(3):pgac106.

PMID: 36741429 PMC: 9896936. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac106.


Dataset of physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures from a group decision-making lab study.

Burns A, Wallot S, Berson Y, Gordon I Data Brief. 2022; 45:108630.

PMID: 36426035 PMC: 9679454. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108630.


References
1.
Rouder J . The what, why, and how of born-open data. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(3):1062-9. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0630-z. View

2.
Piwowar H, Day R, Fridsma D . Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS One. 2007; 2(3):e308. PMC: 1817752. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000308. View

3.
Savage C, Vickers A . Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS One. 2009; 4(9):e7078. PMC: 2739314. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007078. View

4.
. No impact without data access. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(7):691. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3351. View

5.
Vogeli C, Yucel R, Bendavid E, Jones L, Anderson M, Seashore Louis K . Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2006; 81(2):128-36. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00007. View