» Articles » PMID: 33319317

Using Mouse Cursor Tracking to Investigate Online Cognition: Preserving Methodological Ingenuity While Moving Toward Reproducible Science

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Dec 15
PMID 33319317
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis to facilitate the development of best practices. Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated effects of experimental design features on a number of mousetracking outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the mouse-tracking literature to survey the reporting and spread of mouse variables (Cursor speed, Sampling rate, Training), physical characteristics of the experiments (Stimulus position, Response box position) and response requirements (Start procedure, Response procedure, Response deadline). This survey reveals that there is room for improvement in reporting practices, especially of subtler design features that researchers may have assumed would not impact research results (e.g., Cursor speed). We provide recommendations for future best practices in mouse-tracking studies and consider how best to standardize the mouse-tracking literature without excessively constraining the methodological flexibility that is essential to the field.

Citing Articles

Movement trajectories as a window into the dynamics of emerging neural representations.

Koenig-Robert R, Quek G, Grootswagers T, Varlet M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11499.

PMID: 38769313 PMC: 11106280. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62135-7.


Age-related changes in motor planning for prior intentions: a mouse tracking reach-to-click task.

Zhang S, Wilmut K, Zhang K, Wang S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1323798.

PMID: 38562237 PMC: 10983849. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323798.


The temporal development of memory processes in source monitoring: An investigation with mouse tracking.

Tanyas H, Kuhlmann B Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2305-2314.

PMID: 37138149 PMC: 10156421. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02289-z.


Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics.

Smith K, Morrison S, Henderson A, Erb C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19065.

PMID: 36351962 PMC: 9646795. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20579-9.


Online mouse cursor trajectories distinguish phonological activation by linguistic and nonlinguistic sounds.

Kukona A, Jordan A Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(1):362-372.

PMID: 35882722 PMC: 9971122. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02153-6.


References
1.
Freeman J . Doing psychological science by hand. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018; 27(5):315-323. PMC: 6301007. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417746793. View

2.
Kieslich P, Schoemann M, Grage T, Hepp J, Scherbaum S . Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?. Behav Res Methods. 2019; 52(1):317-341. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01228-y. View

3.
Wicherts J, Veldkamp C, Augusteijn H, Bakker M, van Aert R, van Assen M . Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid -Hacking. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1832. PMC: 5122713. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832. View

4.
Calluso C, Committeri G, Pezzulo G, Lepora N, Tosoni A . Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter-individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 233(12):3597-611. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4427-1. View

5.
Bandettini P . Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(2):575-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.026. View