» Articles » PMID: 26890025

'Well, if the Kids Can Do It, I Can Do It': Older Rehabilitation Patients' Experiences of Telerehabilitation

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Feb 19
PMID 26890025
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Although trials continue to emerge supporting the role of telerehabilitation, implementation has been slow. Key users include older people living with disabilities who are frequent users of hospital rehabilitation services but whose voices are rarely heard. It is unclear whether the use of technologies and reduced face-to-face contact is acceptable to these people. We report on a qualitative study of community dwelling participants who had received a home telerehabilitation programme as an alternative to conventional rehabilitation.

Design: Thirteen older participants, three spouses and one carer were interviewed. All had participated in an individualized therapy programme, using a combination of face-to-face and video consults with therapists. The programme used 'off-the-shelf' technologies including iPads for videoconferencing and electronic FitBit devices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software.

Results: Thematic analysis resulted in five emergent themes: (i) telerehabilitation is convenient; (ii) telerehabilitation promotes motivation and self-awareness; (iii) telerehabilitation fosters positive therapeutic relationships; (iv) mastering technologies used by younger relatives is a valued aspect of telerehabilitation; and (v) Telerehabilitation does not replace traditional face-to-face rehabilitation therapies.

Conclusions: Participants found telerehabilitation convenient and motivating, coped well with the technology and developed positive therapeutic relationships. The learning and practice aspects sat well in the context of a rehabilitation programme. The use of commercially available technologies may have contributed to respondents' high levels of acceptability. The perception of telerehabilitation as complementary to in-person care and the expectation of technological support have implications for the implementation and delivery of telerehabilitation services to older people.

Citing Articles

Patient Preferences for Telerehabilitation Compared to In-Person Physiotherapy: A Binary Discrete Choice Experiment.

Ross M, Simmich J, Magor T, Russell T Physiother Res Int. 2025; 30(2):e70042.

PMID: 40008766 PMC: 11863538. DOI: 10.1002/pri.70042.


Healthcare professionals' beliefs, attitudes, and thoughts toward cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation: A mixed-methods study.

Borgnis F, Isernia S, Rossetto F, Pagliari C, Tavanelli M, Brambilla L Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40436.

PMID: 39634414 PMC: 11615505. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40436.


Physiotherapists' perceptions, readiness, enablers, and barriers to use telerehabilitation: A scoping review.

Sia L, Sharma S, Ing J, Kumar S, Singh D J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024; 37(6):1441-1454.

PMID: 38905032 PMC: 11613087. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-240009.


Exploring physiotherapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: Insights from focus groups.

Sia L, Sharma S, Kumar S, Singh D Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241248916.

PMID: 38665882 PMC: 11044802. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241248916.


Demystifying the Digital Divide: Disparities in Telerehabilitation Readiness Among Older Adults in the United States.

Falvey J, Sun N, Miller M, Pravdo A, Daniel Mullins C Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024; 105(7):1255-1261.

PMID: 38554795 PMC: 11227418. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.009.


References
1.
Calvert Jr J, Kaye J, Leahy M, Hexem K, Carlson N . Technology use by rural and urban oldest old. Technol Health Care. 2009; 17(1):1-11. PMC: 2830255. DOI: 10.3233/THC-2009-0527. View

2.
Guilcher S, Bereket T, Voth J, Haroun V, Jaglal S . Spanning boundaries into remote communities: an exploration of experiences with telehealth chronic disease self-management programs in rural northern ontario, Canada. Telemed J E Health. 2013; 19(12):904-9. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0057. View

3.
Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M . A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 31(6):427-47. DOI: 10.1080/09638280802062553. View

4.
Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I . Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2013; 18(3):438-49. PMC: 5060789. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12109. View

5.
Taylor D, Stone S, Huijbregts M . Remote participants' experiences with a group-based stroke self-management program using videoconference technology. Rural Remote Health. 2012; 12:1947. View