» Articles » PMID: 23914810

Ethical Implications of Home Telecare for Older People: a Framework Derived from a Multisited Participative Study

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Aug 7
PMID 23914810
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Telecare and telehealth developments have recently attracted much attention in research and service development contexts, where their evaluation has predominantly concerned effectiveness and efficiency. Their social and ethical implications, in contrast, have received little scrutiny.

Objective: To develop an ethical framework for telecare systems based on analysis of observations of telecare-in-use and citizens' panel deliberations.

Design: Ethnographic study (observation, work shadowing), interviews, older citizens' panels and a participative conference.

Setting: Participants' homes, workplaces and familiar community venues in England, Spain, the Netherlands and Norway 2008-2011.

Results: Older respondents expressed concerns that telecare might be used to replace face-to-face/hands-on care to cut costs. Citizens' panels strongly advocated ethical and social questions being considered in tandem with technical and policy developments. Older people are too often excluded from telecare system design, and installation is often wrongly seen as a one-off event. Some systems enhance self-care by increasing self-awareness, while others shift agency away from the older person, introducing new forms of dependency.

Conclusions: Telecare has care limitations; it is not a solution, but a shift in networks of relations and responsibilities. Telecare cannot be meaningfully evaluated as an entity, but rather in the situated relations people and technologies create together. Characteristics of ethical telecare include on-going user/carer engagement in decision making about systems: in-home system evolution with feedback opportunities built into implementation. System design should be horizontal, 'two-way'/interactive rather than vertical or 'one-way'. An ethical framework for telecare has been developed from these conclusions (Table 1).

Citing Articles

Understanding Older Adults' Intention to Use Telehealth: A Qualitative Study Using the UTAUT Framework.

Fleischer A, Lowman J, Strader K J Prim Care Community Health. 2025; 16:21501319251320180.

PMID: 39976543 PMC: 11843705. DOI: 10.1177/21501319251320180.


The Uses and Experiences of Synchronous Communication Technology for Home-Dwelling Older Adults in a Home Care Services Context: Qualitative Systematic Review.

Bavngaard M, Lund A, Thordardottir B, Rasmussen E J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e59285.

PMID: 39576979 PMC: 11624454. DOI: 10.2196/59285.


Applications to augment patient care for Internal Medicine specialists: a position paper from the EFIM working group on telemedicine, innovative technologies & digital health.

Pietrantonio F, Florczak M, Kuhn S, Karberg K, Leung T, Said Criado I Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1370555.

PMID: 39005984 PMC: 11239350. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1370555.


Gerontechnologies, ethics, and care phases: Secondary analysis of qualitative interviews.

Martani A, Tian Y, Felber N, Wangmo T Nurs Ethics. 2024; 32(1):141-155.

PMID: 38470960 PMC: 11771086. DOI: 10.1177/09697330241238340.


Understanding the Value of a Proactive Telecare System in Supporting Older Adults' Independence at Home: Qualitative Interview Study Among Key Interest Groups.

Fothergill L, Holland C, Latham Y, Hayes N J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e47997.

PMID: 38096023 PMC: 10732490. DOI: 10.2196/47997.


References
1.
May C, Mort M, Williams T, Mair F, Gask L . Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(4):697-710. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00419-7. View

2.
Mort M, Finch T . Principles for telemedicine and telecare: the perspective of a citizens' panel. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11 Suppl 1:66-8. DOI: 10.1258/1357633054461877. View

3.
Mort M, Roberts C, Callen B . Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity?. Sociol Health Illn. 2012; 35(6):799-812. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.x. View

4.
McCartney M . Show us the evidence for telehealth. BMJ. 2012; 344:e469. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e469. View

5.
Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S . Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012; 344:e3874. PMC: 3381047. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e3874. View