» Articles » PMID: 26888087

Interventions to Improve Patients' Compliance with Therapies Aimed at Lowering Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 1 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials of Psychological, Telecare, and Educational...

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Feb 19
PMID 26888087
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Brazilian records on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes show treatment efficacy. Poor patient adherence to therapeutic proposals influences these results and can be associated with social, psychological, and economic aspects, besides others factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of psychological, telecare, and educational interventions to improve treatment compliance among patients with type 1 diabetes. Compliance was assessed indirectly using reduction of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as the principal outcome measure.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases up to April 2015. The following medical subject headings were used: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Patient Compliance or Adherence, Hemoglobin A, glycated, and Randomized Controlled Trial. The principal outcome was change in HbA1c between baseline and follow-up. Where appropriate, trials were combined in meta-analysis using fixed effects models.

Results: From 191 articles initially identified, 57 were full text reviewed, and 19 articles met the inclusion criteria providing data from 1782 patients (49.4 % males, age 18 years). The RCTs (2 to 24 months in duration) were divided into four groups according to type of intervention: psychology (seven studies; 818 patients), telecare (six studies; 494 patients); education (five studies; 349 patients), and psychoeducation (one study; 153 patients). All studies reported some type of adherence measurement of the interventions. Decrease in HbA1c was observed after psychology (MD -0.310; 95 % CI, -0.599 to -0.0210, P = 0.035) but not after telecare (MD -0.124 %; 95 % CI, -0.268, 0.020; P = 0.090) or educational (MD -0.001; 95 % CI, -0.202, 0.200; P = 0.990) interventions.

Conclusion: Psychological approaches to improve adherence to diabetes care treatment modestly reduced HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes; telecare and education interventions did not change glycemic control. However, the limited number of studies included as well as their methodological quality should be taken into account.

Citing Articles

Socio-cognitive determinants affecting insulin adherence/non-adherence in late adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.

AlBurno H, Francine S, de Vries H, Mohanadi D, Jongen S, Mercken L Health Psychol Rep. 2025; 13(1):1-26.

PMID: 40041295 PMC: 11873924. DOI: 10.5114/hpr/194439.


The impact of telemedicine on pediatric type 1 diabetes management: benefits, challenges, and future directions.

Esposito S, Sambati V, Fogliazza F, Street M, Principi N Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1513166.

PMID: 39758346 PMC: 11695225. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1513166.


Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee D, Lee H, Lee M, Park G Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024; 21(6):665-677.

PMID: 39497508 PMC: 11655730. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12751.


Gaining consensus on emotional wellbeing themes and preferences for digital intervention type and content to support the mental health of young people with long-term health conditions: A Delphi study.

Brown J, Cox L, Mulligan K, Wilson S, Heys M, Livermore P Health Expect. 2024; 27(2):e14025.

PMID: 38591848 PMC: 11003273. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14025.


Posttraumatic stress disorder and diabetes-related outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Lunkenheimer F, Eckert A, Hilgard D, Koth D, Kulzer B, Luck U Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1556.

PMID: 36707607 PMC: 9883226. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28373-x.


References
1.
Nathan D, Cleary P, Backlund J, Genuth S, Lachin J, Orchard T . Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(25):2643-53. PMC: 2637991. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187. View

2.
. Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. JAMA. 2003; 290(16):2159-67. PMC: 2622725. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2159. View

3.
Ellis D, Yopp J, Templin T, Naar-King S, Frey M, Cunningham P . Family mediators and moderators of treatment outcomes among youths with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006; 32(2):194-205. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj116. View

4.
Nyomba B, Berard L, Murphy L . Facilitating access to glucometer reagents increases blood glucose self-monitoring frequency and improves glycaemic control: a prospective study in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2004; 21(2):129-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01070.x. View

5.
Nansel T, Iannotti R, Simons-Morton B, Cox C, Plotnick L, Clark L . Diabetes personal trainer outcomes: short-term and 1-year outcomes of a diabetes personal trainer intervention among youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(10):2471-7. PMC: 2365717. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2621. View