» Articles » PMID: 26880671

SCALS: a Fourth-generation Study of Assisted Living Technologies in Their Organisational, Social, Political and Policy Context

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Feb 17
PMID 26880671
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Research to date into assisted living technologies broadly consists of 3 generations: technical design, experimental trials and qualitative studies of the patient experience. We describe a fourth-generation paradigm: studies of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. Fourth-generation studies are necessarily organic and emergent; they view technology as part of a dynamic, networked and potentially unstable system. They use co-design methods to generate and stabilise local solutions, taking account of context.

Methods And Analysis: SCALS (Studies in Co-creating Assisted Living Solutions) consists (currently) of 5 organisational case studies, each an English health or social care organisation striving to introduce technology-supported services to support independent living in people with health and/or social care needs. Treating these cases as complex systems, we seek to explore interdependencies, emergence and conflict. We employ a co-design approach informed by the principles of action research to help participating organisations establish, refine and evaluate their service. To that end, we are conducting in-depth ethnographic studies of people's experience of assisted living technologies (micro level), embedded in evolving organisational case studies that use interviews, ethnography and document analysis (meso level), and exploring the wider national and international context for assisted living technologies and policy (macro level). Data will be analysed using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory.

Ethics And Dissemination: Research ethics approval for the first 4 case studies has been granted. An important outcome will be lessons learned from individual co-design case studies. We will document the studies' credibility and rigour, and assess the transferability of findings to other settings while also recognising unique aspects of the contexts in which they were generated. Academic outputs will include a cross-case analysis and progress in theory and method of fourth-generation assisted living technology research. We will produce practical guidance for organisations, policymakers, designers and service users.

Citing Articles

Understanding the implementation of a multidisciplinary intervention using a suite of prescribing safety indicators to improve medication safety in prison healthcare settings: a qualitative study.

Jeffries M, Abuzour A, Ashcroft D, Avery T, Langridge M, Francis G BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e086309.

PMID: 40044207 PMC: 11883610. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086309.


Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study.

Galvao W, Silva L, Viana R, Oliveira P, Juca R, Martins H Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2024; 37(1):21-30.

PMID: 38912104 PMC: 11192430. DOI: 10.1177/15691861241241776.


A conceptualisation of scale-up and sustainability of social innovations in global health: a narrative review and integrative framework for action.

Niang M, Alami H, Gagnon M, Dupere S Glob Health Action. 2023; 16(1):2230813.

PMID: 37459240 PMC: 10353334. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2230813.


Using sociotechnical theory to understand medication safety work in primary care and prescribers' use of clinical decision support: a qualitative study.

Jeffries M, Salema N, Laing L, Shamsuddin A, Sheikh A, Avery T BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e068798.

PMID: 37105697 PMC: 10151989. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068798.


Risk Negotiation With People With Dementia: From Co-designed Paper Version to Implementation Preparation of an Electronic Conversation Tool.

Meyer C, Dickins M, OKeefe F, Hall K, Lowthian J Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023; 9:23337214221149772.

PMID: 36726412 PMC: 9885029. DOI: 10.1177/23337214221149772.


References
1.
Gibson G, Newton L, Pritchard G, Finch T, Brittain K, Robinson L . The provision of assistive technology products and services for people with dementia in the United Kingdom. Dementia (London). 2014; 15(4):681-701. DOI: 10.1177/1471301214532643. View

2.
Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K . Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2002; 5(23):iii-157. View

3.
Greenhalgh T, Stones R, Swinglehurst D . Choose and Book: a sociological analysis of 'resistance' to an expert system. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 104:210-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.014. View

4.
Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A . Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014; 68(3):369-78. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12345. View

5.
Smith N, Clark C, Fahy A, Tharmaratnam V, Lewis D, Thompson C . The Olympic Regeneration in East London (ORiEL) study: protocol for a prospective controlled quasi-experiment to evaluate the impact of urban regeneration on young people and their families. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4). PMC: 3432843. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001840. View