Cost-effectiveness of an Internet-delivered Treatment for Substance Abuse: Data from a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Drug Alcohol Depend

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2016 Feb 17

PMID 26880594

Citations 28

Authors

Sean M Murphy

Aimee N C Campbell

Udi E Ghitza

Tiffany L Kyle

Genie L Bailey

Edward V Nunes

Daniel Polsky

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Substance misuse and excessive alcohol consumption are major public health issues. Internet-based interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) are a relatively new method for addressing barriers to access and supplementing existing care. This study examines cost-effectiveness in a multisite, randomized trial of an internet-based version of the community reinforcement approach (CRA) with contingency management (CM) known as the Therapeutic Education System (TES).

Methods: Economic evaluation of the 12-week trial with follow-up at 24 and 36 weeks. 507 individuals who were seeking therapy for alcohol or other substance use disorders at 10 outpatient community-based treatment programs were recruited and randomized to either treatment as usual (TAU) or TES+TAU. Sub-analyses were completed on participants with a poorer prognosis (i.e., those not abstinent at study entry).

Results: From the provider's perspective, TES+TAU as it was implemented in this study costs $278 (SE=87) more than TAU alone after 12 weeks. The quality-adjusted life years gained by TES+TAU and TAU were similar; however, TES+TAU has at least a 95% chance of being considered cost-effective for providers and payers with willingness-to-pay thresholds as low as $20,000 per abstinent year. Findings for the subgroup not abstinent at study entry are slightly more favorable.

Conclusions: With regard to the clinical outcome of abstinence, our cost-effectiveness findings of TES+TAU compare favorably to those found elsewhere in the CM literature. The analyses performed here serve as an initial economic framework for future studies integrating technology into SUD therapy.

Citing Articles

Comparative- and Cost-Effectiveness Research Determining the Optimal Intervention for Advancing Transgender Women With HIV to Full Viral Suppression (Text Me, Alexis!): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reback C, Blue T, Jalali A, Landovitz R, Li M, Mata R JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e65313.

PMID: 39847410 PMC: 11803334. DOI: 10.2196/65313.

Cost-Effectiveness of Implementation Facilitation to Promote Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder.

Lu T, Ryan D, Cadet T, Chawarski M, Coupet E, Edelman E Ann Emerg Med. 2024; 85(3):205-213.

PMID: 39570250 PMC: 11845297. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.10.001.

Exploring user experiences of a text message-delivered intervention among individuals on opioid use disorder treatment in Kenya: A qualitative study.

Kiburi S, Paruk S, Kwobah E, Chiliza B PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2(11):e0000375.

PMID: 37930956 PMC: 10627438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000375.

The use of patient navigation to transition detoxification patients to substance use treatment in the Alaska Interior.

Running Bear U, Poole E, Muller C, Hanson J, Noonan C, Trojan J Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023; 6:100418.

PMID: 37635913 PMC: 10448195. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100418.

Use of an Automated Bilingual Digital Health Tool to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use Among Latino Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Vaca F, Dziura J, Abujarad F, Pantalon M, Hsiao A, Reynolds J JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(5):e2314848.

PMID: 37219901 PMC: 10208138. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14848.

References

Seaman S, White I . Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2011; 22(3):278-95. DOI: 10.1177/0962280210395740. View

Bewick B, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill A, Cahill J, Mulhern B . The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption--a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008; 47(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.005. View

Bickel W, Amass L, Higgins S, Badger G, Esch R . Effects of adding behavioral treatment to opioid detoxification with buprenorphine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997; 65(5):803-10. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.5.803. View

Gunderson E, Fiellin D, Levin F, Sullivan L, Kleber H . Evaluation of a combined online and in person training in the use of buprenorphine. Subst Abus. 2006; 27(3):39-45. PMC: 3864017. DOI: 10.1300/J465v27n03_06. View

Manning W, Mullahy J . Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?. J Health Econ. 2001; 20(4):461-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00086-8. View

Higgins S, Sigmon S, Wong C, Heil S, Badger G, Donham R . Community reinforcement therapy for cocaine-dependent outpatients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003; 60(10):1043-52. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.1043. View

Campbell A, Nunes E, Matthews A, Stitzer M, Miele G, Polsky D . Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014; 171(6):683-90. PMC: 4079279. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081055. View

Kvamme E, Catlin M, Banta-Green C, Roll J, Rosenblatt R . Who prescribes buprenorphine for rural patients? The impact of specialty, location and practice type in Washington State. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012; 44(3):355-60. PMC: 3886338. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.006. View

Bickel W, Marsch L, Buchhalter A, Badger G . Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 16(2):132-43. PMC: 2746734. DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.132. View

10.

Moore B, Fazzino T, Garnet B, Cutter C, Barry D . Computer-based interventions for drug use disorders: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 40(3):215-23. PMC: 3073660. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.11.002. View

11.

Campbell A, Nunes E, Miele G, Matthews A, Polsky D, Ghitza U . Design and methodological considerations of an effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention: an example from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011; 33(2):386-95. PMC: 3268951. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.001. View

12.

. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16(3):199-208. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. View

13.

Raven M, Carrier E, Lee J, Billings J, Marr M, Gourevitch M . Substance use treatment barriers for patients with frequent hospital admissions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 38(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.05.009. View

14.

Cunningham C, Kunins H, Roose R, Elam R, Sohler N . Barriers to obtaining waivers to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid addiction treatment among HIV physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(9):1325-9. PMC: 2219773. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0264-7. View

15.

Murphy S, Fishman P, McPherson S, Dyck D, Roll J . Determinants of buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 46(3):315-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.09.003. View

16.

Mark T, Kranzler H, Song X, Bransberger P, Poole V, Crosse S . Physicians' opinions about medications to treat alcoholism. Addiction. 2003; 98(5):617-26. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00377.x. View

17.

Polsky D, Glick H, Yang J, Subramaniam G, Poole S, Woody G . Cost-effectiveness of extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for opioid-dependent youth: data from a randomized trial. Addiction. 2010; 105(9):1616-24. PMC: 2967450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03001.x. View

18.

Walley A, Alperen J, Cheng D, Botticelli M, Castro-Donlan C, Samet J . Office-based management of opioid dependence with buprenorphine: clinical practices and barriers. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(9):1393-8. PMC: 2518016. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0686-x. View

19.

Tate D, Finkelstein E, Khavjou O, Gustafson A . Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38(1):40-5. PMC: 2772952. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6. View

20.

Wantland D, Portillo C, Holzemer W, Slaughter R, McGhee E . The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 6(4):e40. PMC: 1550624. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40. View