» Articles » PMID: 24700332

Internet-delivered Treatment for Substance Abuse: a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective: Computer-delivered interventions have the potential to improve access to quality addiction treatment care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Therapeutic Education System (TES), an Internet-delivered behavioral intervention that includes motivational incentives, as a clinician-extender in the treatment of substance use disorders.

Method: Adult men and women (N=507) entering 10 outpatient addiction treatment programs were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual (N=252) or treatment as usual plus TES, with the intervention substituting for about 2 hours of standard care per week (N=255). TES consists of 62 computerized interactive modules covering skills for achieving and maintaining abstinence, plus prize-based motivational incentives contingent on abstinence and treatment adherence. Treatment as usual consisted of individual and group counseling at the participating programs. The primary outcome measures were abstinence from drugs and heavy drinking (measured by twice-weekly urine drug screens and self-report) and time to dropout from treatment.

Results: Compared with patients in the treatment-as-usual group, those in the TES group had a lower dropout rate (hazard ratio=0.72, 95% CI=0.57, 0.92) and a greater abstinence rate (odds ratio=1.62, 95% CI=1.12, 2.35). This effect was more pronounced among patients who had a positive urine drug or breath alcohol screen at study entry (N=228) (odds ratio=2.18, 95% CI=1.30, 3.68).

Conclusions: Internet-delivered interventions such as TES have the potential to expand access and improve addiction treatment outcomes. Additional research is needed to assess effectiveness in non-specialty clinical settings and to differentiate the effects of the community reinforcement approach and contingency management components of TES.

Citing Articles

What smartphone apps exist to support recovery from opioid use disorder? A content analysis of publicly available opioid-related smartphone apps.

Williamson A, Heydarshahi B, Finley-Abboud D, Massac L, Jacobson L, Christophe N Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025; 20(1):26.

PMID: 40075426 PMC: 11905484. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-025-00549-y.


Application of Causal Forest Model to Examine Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Substance Use Disorder Psychosocial Treatments.

Susukida R, Amin-Esmaeili M, Badillo-Goicoechea E, Nguyen T, Stuart E, Rosenblum M Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024; 34(1):e70011.

PMID: 39729473 PMC: 11675088. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.70011.


Use of Digital Health and Digital Therapeutics to Treat SUD in Criminal Justice Settings: a Review.

Sawyer-Morris G, Wilde J, Molfenter T, Taxman F Curr Addict Rep. 2024; 11(1):149-162.

PMID: 39676893 PMC: 11643629. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-023-00523-1.


Formative evaluation of the implementation of digital therapeutics for opioids and other substance use disorders in primary care (DIGITS trial).

Palazzo L, Dorsey C, Mogk J, Beatty T, King D, Stefanik-Guizlo K Implement Res Pract. 2024; 5:26334895241301670.

PMID: 39676816 PMC: 11639013. DOI: 10.1177/26334895241301670.


Drug Overdose Death among Residents of Urban Census Tracts: How Granular Geographical Analyses Uncover Socioenvironmental Correlates in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

McMaster R, Masarweh-Zawahri L, Flynn K, Deo V, Flannery D J Urban Health. 2024; .

PMID: 39627444 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-024-00939-8.


References
1.
McLellan A, Carise D, Kleber H . Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public's demand for quality care?. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003; 25(2):117-21. View

2.
Kampman K, Volpicelli J, Mulvaney F, Rukstalis M, Alterman A, Pettinati H . Cocaine withdrawal severity and urine toxicology results from treatment entry predict outcome in medication trials for cocaine dependence. Addict Behav. 2002; 27(2):251-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00171-x. View

3.
Kay-Lambkin F, Baker A, Lewin T, Carr V . Computer-based psychological treatment for comorbid depression and problematic alcohol and/or cannabis use: a randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy. Addiction. 2009; 104(3):378-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02444.x. View

4.
Kiluk B, Sugarman D, Nich C, Gibbons C, Martino S, Rounsaville B . A methodological analysis of randomized clinical trials of computer-assisted therapies for psychiatric disorders: toward improved standards for an emerging field. Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168(8):790-9. PMC: 3607199. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10101443. View

5.
Magill M, Ray L . Cognitive-behavioral treatment with adult alcohol and illicit drug users: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009; 70(4):516-27. PMC: 2696292. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.516. View