» Articles » PMID: 26861796

Drivers Who Self-estimate Lower Blood Alcohol Concentrations Are Riskier Drivers After Drinking

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Feb 11
PMID 26861796
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Alcohol increases the tendency for risky driving in some individuals but not others. Little is known about the factors underlying this individual difference. Studies find that those who underestimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) following a dose of alcohol tend to be more impulsive and report greater willingness to drive after drinking than those who estimate their BACs to be greater than their actual BAC. BAC underestimation could contribute to risky driving behavior following alcohol as such drivers might perceive little impairment in their driving ability and thus no need for caution.

Objectives: This study was designed to test the relationship between drivers' BAC estimations following a dose of alcohol or a placebo and the degree of risky driving they displayed during a simulated driving test.

Methods: Forty adult drivers performed a simulated driving test and estimated their blood alcohol concentration after receiving a dose of alcohol (0.65 g/kg for men and 0.56 g/kg for women) or a placebo.

Results: Alcohol increased risk-taking and impaired driving skill. Those who estimated their BAC to be lower were the riskiest drivers following both alcohol and placebo.

Conclusions: The tendency to estimate lower BACs could support a series of high-risk decisions, regardless of one's actual BAC. This could include the decision to drive after drinking.

Citing Articles

Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.

Haney A, Warner O, McMullin S, Motschman C, Trull T, McCarthy D Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 38(1):47-55.

PMID: 37141035 PMC: 10624646. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000929.


Investigating the relationship between inaccurate blood alcohol concentration estimates, harm and other negative consequences.

De Andrade D, Button K, Coomber K, Taylor N, Ferris J, Curtis A Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022; 42(2):467-475.

PMID: 36449348 PMC: 10286749. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13569.


Event-Level Predictors of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Intentions.

Motschman C, Hatz L, McCarty K, Merkle E, Trull T, McCarthy D J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020; 81(5):647-654.

PMID: 33028478 PMC: 8076488.


Alcohol consumption for simulated driving performance: A systematic review.

Rezaee-Zavareh M, Salamati P, Ramezani-Binabaj M, Saeidnejad M, Rousta M, Shokraneh F Chin J Traumatol. 2017; 20(3):166-172.

PMID: 28502603 PMC: 5473736. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.04.002.


Curbing the DUI offender's self-efficacy to drink and drive: A laboratory study.

Roberts W, Fillmore M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017; 172:73-79.

PMID: 28152449 PMC: 5309158. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.005.

References
1.
Aston E, Liguori A . Self-estimation of blood alcohol concentration: a review. Addict Behav. 2013; 38(4):1944-51. PMC: 3592207. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.017. View

2.
Quinn P, Fromme K . Event-level associations between objective and subjective alcohol intoxication and driving after drinking across the college years. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011; 26(3):384-92. PMC: 3260341. DOI: 10.1037/a0024275. View

3.
Aston E, Neiberg R, Liguori A . Breath alcohol estimation training: behavioral effects and predictors of success. Alcohol Alcohol. 2013; 48(4):396-401. PMC: 3685329. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agt047. View

4.
Laude J, Fillmore M . Simulated driving performance under alcohol: Effects on driver-risk versus driver-skill. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 154:271-7. PMC: 4536118. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.012. View

5.
Zador P, Krawchuk S, Voas R . Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. J Stud Alcohol. 2000; 61(3):387-95. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.387. View