» Articles » PMID: 15830219

Compensating for Alcohol-induced Impairment of Control: Effects on Inhibition and Activation of Behavior

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2005 Apr 15
PMID 15830219
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Studies have shown that expectations of alcohol-induced impairment can produce adaptive responses to alcohol that reduce the degree of behavioral impairment displayed. However, compensatory effects have been variable for cognitive and psychomotor tasks.

Objectives: Using a model-driven approach to understanding behavioral control, the present study examined compensatory and impairment effects following the expectation and actual administration of alcohol on the ability to inhibit and activate behavior.

Methods: Social drinkers (N=17) performed a cued go/no-go task that required quick responses to go targets and inhibition of responses to no-go targets under four conditions: no treatment, alcohol expectancy (placebo), 0.45 g/kg alcohol, and 0.65 g/kg alcohol.

Results: Inhibitory and activational aspects of behavioral control were impaired by both active doses of alcohol. Alcohol slowed response activation and increased failures to inhibit responses in a dose-dependent manner. Subjects also displayed a small, but statistically significant, compensatory improvement in inhibitory control in response to the expectation of alcohol. Moreover, individual differences in the compensatory response were related to differences in alcohol impairment. Those who displayed greater compensatory responses to placebo displayed the least impairment in response to alcohol.

Conclusions: By modeling behavioral control as the net effect of countervailing activational and inhibitory influences, the study suggests that fundamental mechanisms of control might not display uniform compensatory reactions to alcohol-related cues. Greater consideration of how alcohol-related expectancies shape behaviors under the drug should lead to a better understanding of individual differences with respect to risk for alcohol abuse.

Citing Articles

Heightened sensitivity to the disinhibiting effect of alcohol in women during the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Griffith A, Martel M, Eisenlohr-Moul T, Fillmore M Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022; 31(4):839-848.

PMID: 36265052 PMC: 10302159. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000611.


Moderate acute alcohol use impairs intentional inhibition rather than stimulus-driven inhibition.

Liu Y, Grasman R, Wiers R, Ridderinkhof K, van den Wildenberg W Psychol Res. 2020; 85(4):1449-1461.

PMID: 32430540 PMC: 8211579. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01353-w.


Different aspects of impulsivity in chronic alcohol use disorder with and without comorbid problem gambling.

Kovacs I, Demeter I, Janka Z, Demetrovics Z, Maraz A, Ando B PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227645.

PMID: 31999707 PMC: 6992191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227645.


Using Placebo Beverages in Group Alcohol Studies.

Bowdring M, Sayette M Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018; 42(12):2442-2452.

PMID: 30247751 PMC: 6286248. DOI: 10.1111/acer.13895.


Alcohol effects on response inhibition: Variability across tasks and individuals.

Bartholow B, Fleming K, Wood P, Cowan N, Saults J, Altamirano L Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(3):251-267.

PMID: 29863383 PMC: 5991490. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000190.


References
1.
Lapp W, Collins R, Zywiak W, Izzo C . Psychopharmacological effects of alcohol on time perception: the extended balanced placebo design. J Stud Alcohol. 1994; 55(1):96-112. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.96. View

2.
Nagoshi C, Noll R, Wood M . Alcohol expectancies and behavioral and emotional responses to placebo versus alcohol administration. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992; 16(2):255-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01372.x. View

3.
Beirness D, Vogel-Sprott M . Alcohol tolerance in social drinkers: operant and classical conditioning effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984; 84(3):393-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00555219. View

4.
Schuckit M . Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry. 1994; 151(2):184-9. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.151.2.184. View

5.
Solomon R, CORBIT J . An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol Rev. 1974; 81(2):119-45. DOI: 10.1037/h0036128. View