» Articles » PMID: 26858944

Measuring the Mental Health-Care System Responsiveness: Results of an Outpatient Survey in Tehran

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Feb 10
PMID 26858944
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As explained by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000, the concept of health system responsiveness is one of the core goals of health systems. Since 2000, further efforts have been made to measure health system responsiveness and the factors affecting responsiveness, yet few studies have applied responsiveness concepts to the evaluation of mental health systems. The present study aims to measure responsiveness and its related domains in the mental health-care system of Tehran. Utilizing the same method used by the WHO for its responsiveness survey, responsiveness for outpatient mental health care was evaluated using a validated Farsi questionnaire. A sample of 500 public mental health service users in Tehran participated and subsequently completed the questionnaire. On average, 47% of participants reported experiencing poor responsiveness. Among responsiveness domains, confidentiality and dignity were the best performing factors while autonomy, access to care, and quality of basic amenities were the worst performing. Respondents who reported their social status as low were more likely to experience poor responsiveness overall. Attention and access to care were responsiveness dimensions that performed poorly but were considered to be highly important by study participants. In summary, the study suggests that measuring responsiveness could provide guidance for further development of mental health-care systems to become more patient orientated and provide patients with more respect.

Citing Articles

Health systems responsiveness towards needs of pregnant women in Vietnam.

Vui L, Quy L, Thi L, Cronin de Chavez A, Manzano A, Lakin K BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1618.

PMID: 39696416 PMC: 11657425. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12040-6.


Health system responsiveness and associated factors for delivery care in public health facilities, Dessie City Administration, South Wollo zone, Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study design.

Bayeh Y, Tsehay C, Negash W BMJ Open. 2023; 13(7):e069655.

PMID: 37479512 PMC: 10364148. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069655.


Healthcare System Responsiveness in Covid-19: An Experience from Capital City of I.R of Iran.

Setareh Forouzan A, Mirabzadeh A, Falahat K, Banazadeh Z, Baradaran Eftekhari M Int J Prev Med. 2023; 14:34.

PMID: 37351045 PMC: 10284203. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_14_22.


A comparison of patient-reported quality between inpatient services for mental and physical health: A tertiary-hospital-based survey in China.

Zhou W, Xiao S, Xie G, Ouyang F, Luo B Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1090892.

PMID: 36846224 PMC: 9949676. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1090892.


Mental Health System Responsiveness during COVID-19 in People with Pre-Existing Psychiatric Disorders: Experiences from Iran.

Zabihi Poursaadati M, Hosseinzadeh S, Maarefvand M, Bolhari J, Khubchandani J Epidemiologia (Basel). 2023; 4(1):74-84.

PMID: 36810455 PMC: 9944841. DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia4010008.


References
1.
Bergeson S, Dean J . A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA. 2006; 296(23):2848-51. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848. View

2.
Ergler C, Sakdapolrak P, Bohle H, Kearns R . Entitlements to health care: why is there a preference for private facilities among poorer residents of Chennai, India?. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 72(3):327-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.042. View

3.
Bramesfeld A, Wedegartner F, Elgeti H, Bisson S . How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7:99. PMC: 1931438. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-99. View

4.
Forouzan A, Rafiey H, Padyab M, Ghazinour M, Dejman M, Sebastian M . Reliability and validity of a Mental Health System Responsiveness Questionnaire in Iran. Glob Health Action. 2014; 7:24748. PMC: 4116621. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v7.24748. View

5.
Mattsson M, Lawoko S, Cullberg J, Olsson U, Hansson L, Forsell Y . Background factors as determinants of satisfaction with care among first-episode psychosis patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005; 40(9):749-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0945-7. View