» Articles » PMID: 16641657

Primary Care Patients' Involvement in Decision-making is Associated with Improvement in Depression

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 2006 Apr 28
PMID 16641657
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Depression is undertreated in primary care settings. Little research investigates the impact of patient involvement in decisions on guideline-concordant treatment and depression outcomes.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether patient involvement in decision-making is associated with guideline-concordant care and improvement in depression symptoms.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Multisite, nationwide randomized clinical trial of quality improvement strategies for depression in primary care.

Subjects: Primary care patients with current symptoms and probable depressive disorder.

Measurements: Patients rated their involvement in decision-making (IDM) about their care on a 5-point scale from poor to excellent 6 months after entry into the study. Depressive symptoms were measured every 6 months for 2 years using a modified version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale. We examined probabilities (Pr) of receipt of guideline-concordant care and resolution of depression across IDM groups using multivariate logistic regression models controlling for patient and provider factors.

Results: For each 1-point increase in IDM ratings, the probability of patients' report of receiving guideline-concordant care increased 4% to 5% (adjusted Pr 0.31 vs. 0.50 for the lowest and highest IDM ratings, respectively, P < 0.001). Similarly, for each 1-point increase in IDM ratings, the probability of depression resolution increased 2% to 3% (adjusted Pr 0.10 vs. 0.19 for the lowest and highest IDM ratings respectively, P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Depressed patients with higher ratings of involvement in medical decisions have a higher probability of receiving guideline-concordant care and improving their symptoms over an 18-month period. Interventions to increase patient involvement in decision-making may be an important means of improving care for and outcomes of depression.

Citing Articles

Person-centred care during treatment with nasal esketamine - a qualitative study.

Klysing L, Larsson I, Westberg K BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):287.

PMID: 40087713 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02943-y.


Ethical dilemmas surrounding patients´ "unwise" treatment preferences and suboptimal decision quality: case series of three renal cell carcinoma patients who developed local recurrences after non-guideline-concordant care choices.

Rumaihi K, Younes N, Khalil I, Badawi A, Barah A, El Ansari W Pan Afr Med J. 2025; 49:45.

PMID: 39867546 PMC: 11760209. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.45.42047.


Shared decision-making in the treatment of bipolar disorder: findings from a nationwide naturalistic cohort study in everyday clinical practice.

Renes J, Metz M, Nolen W, Hoogendoorn A, Kupka R, Regeer E Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39377952 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02761-8.


Users remain overlooked: Shared decision-making processes for people with anxiety disorders.

Villena A, Hurtado M, Gomez C, Amor G, Vega A, Morales-Asencio J J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024; 32(1):203-214.

PMID: 39161272 PMC: 11704998. DOI: 10.1111/jpm.13095.


Practical Application of a Relationship-Based Model to Engagement for Gene-Drive Vector Control Programs.

Kormos A, Nazare L, Dos Santos A, Lanzaro G Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024; 111(2):341-360.

PMID: 38889708 PMC: 11310621. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0862.