Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited Vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2016 Feb 5

PMID 26845028

Citations 28

Authors

Russell T Hurlburt

Ben Alderson-Day

Simone Kuhn

Charles Fernyhough

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Psychology and cognitive neuroscience often use standardized tasks to elicit particular experiences. We explore whether elicited experiences are similar to spontaneous experiences. In an MRI scanner, five participants performed tasks designed to elicit inner speech (covertly repeating experimenter-supplied words), inner seeing, inner hearing, feeling, and sensing. Then, in their natural environments, participants were trained in four days of random-beep-triggered Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES). They subsequently returned to the scanner for nine 25-min resting-state sessions; during each they received four DES beeps and described those moments (9 × 4 = 36 moments per participant) of spontaneously occurring experience. Enough of those moments included spontaneous inner speech to allow us to compare brain activation during spontaneous inner speech with what we had found in task-elicited inner speech. ROI analysis was used to compare activation in two relevant areas (Heschl's gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus). Task-elicited inner speech was associated with decreased activation in Heschl's gyrus and increased activation in left inferior frontal gyrus. However, spontaneous inner speech had the opposite effect in Heschl's gyrus and no significant effect in left inferior frontal gyrus. This study demonstrates how spontaneous phenomena can be investigated in MRI and calls into question the assumption that task-created phenomena are often neurophysiologically and psychologically similar to spontaneously occurring phenomena.

Citing Articles

Distinct distributed brain networks dissociate self-generated mental states.

Anderson N, Salvo J, Smallwood J, Braga R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060698 PMC: 11888405. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.27.640604.

Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech.

Whitford T, Spencer K, Godwin M, Hirano Y, Chung L, Vodovozov W eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39843220 PMC: 11810546. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0297-24.2025.

Distinct connectivity patterns between perception and attention-related brain networks characterize dyslexia: Machine learning applied to resting-state fMRI.

Taran N, Gatenyo R, Hadjadj E, Farah R, Horowitz-Kraus T Cortex. 2024; 181:216-232.

PMID: 39566125 PMC: 11614717. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.012.

Intrinsic functional networks for distinct sources of error in visual working memory.

Li X, Oestreich L, Rangelov D, Levy-Bencheton D, OSullivan M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(10).

PMID: 39385613 PMC: 11464681. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae401.

Inner speech in the daily lives of people with aphasia.

Alexander J, Hedrick T, Stark B Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1335425.

PMID: 38577124 PMC: 10991845. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335425.

References

Gorgolewski K, Lurie D, Urchs S, Kipping J, Craddock R, Milham M . A correspondence between individual differences in the brain's intrinsic functional architecture and the content and form of self-generated thoughts. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e97176. PMC: 4019564. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097176. View

Hurlburt R, Heavey C . Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 31:148-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.002. View

Delamillieure P, Doucet G, Mazoyer B, Turbelin M, Delcroix N, Mellet E . The resting state questionnaire: An introspective questionnaire for evaluation of inner experience during the conscious resting state. Brain Res Bull. 2009; 81(6):565-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.11.014. View

Kuhn S, Fernyhough C, Alderson-Day B, Hurlburt R . Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI?. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1393. PMC: 4260673. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393. View

Geva S, Jones P, Crinion J, Price C, Baron J, Warburton E . The neural correlates of inner speech defined by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain. 2011; 134(Pt 10):3071-82. PMC: 3187541. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr232. View

Allen P, Laroi F, McGuire P, Aleman A . The hallucinating brain: a review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of hallucinations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007; 32(1):175-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.012. View

McGuire P, Silbersweig D, Murray R, David A, Frackowiak R, Frith C . Functional anatomy of inner speech and auditory verbal imagery. Psychol Med. 1996; 26(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700033699. View

Diaz B, van der Sluis S, Benjamins J, Stoffers D, Hardstone R, Mansvelder H . The ARSQ 2.0 reveals age and personality effects on mind-wandering experiences. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:271. PMC: 3982068. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00271. View

Koechlin E, Jubault T . Broca's area and the hierarchical organization of human behavior. Neuron. 2006; 50(6):963-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.017. View

10.

Olivetti Belardinelli M, Palmiero M, Sestieri C, Nardo D, Di Matteo R, Londei A . An fMRI investigation on image generation in different sensory modalities: the influence of vividness. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009; 132(2):190-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.06.009. View

11.

Baciu M, Rubin C, Decorps M, Segebarth C . fMRI assessment of hemispheric language dominance using a simple inner speech paradigm. NMR Biomed. 1999; 12(5):293-8. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199908)12:5<293::aid-nbm573>3.0.co;2-6. View

12.

Alderson-Day B, Weis S, McCarthy-Jones S, Moseley P, Smailes D, Fernyhough C . The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015; 11(1):110-20. PMC: 4692319. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv094. View

13.

Zatorre R, Halpern A . Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron. 2005; 47(1):9-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.013. View

14.

OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

15.

Curio G, Neuloh G, Numminen J, Jousmaki V, Hari R . Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 9(4):183-91. PMC: 6871984. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200004)9:4<183::aid-hbm1>3.0.co;2-z. View

16.

Agnew Z, McGettigan C, Banks B, Scott S . Articulatory movements modulate auditory responses to speech. Neuroimage. 2012; 73:191-9. PMC: 3708127. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.020. View

17.

Ganis G, Thompson W, Kosslyn S . Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 20(2):226-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012. View

18.

Heavey C, Hurlburt R . The phenomena of inner experience. Conscious Cogn. 2008; 17(3):798-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006. View

19.

Jones S, Fernyhough C . Neural correlates of inner speech and auditory verbal hallucinations: a critical review and theoretical integration. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006; 27(2):140-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.001. View

20.

Fegen D, Buchsbaum B, DEsposito M . The effect of rehearsal rate and memory load on verbal working memory. Neuroimage. 2014; 105:120-31. PMC: 4267698. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.034. View