» Articles » PMID: 37766785

GABA Receptor Availability Relates to Emotion-induced BOLD Responses in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex: Simultaneous FMRI/PET with [C]flumazenil

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37766785
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The fMRI BOLD response to emotional stimuli highlighting the role of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) has been thoroughly investigated. Recently, the relationship between emotion processing and GABA levels has been studied using MPFC proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). However, the role of GABAA receptors in the MPFC during emotion processing remains unexplored.

Methods: Using [11C]flumazenil PET, we investigated the relationship between the binding potential of GABAA receptors and emotion processing as measured using simultaneous fMRI BOLD. We hypothesized a correlation between the percent signal change in the BOLD signal and the binding potential of GABAA receptors in the MPFC. In a combined simultaneous fMRI and [11C]flumazenil-PET study, we analyzed the data from 15 healthy subjects using visual emotional stimuli. Our task comprised two types of emotional processing: passive viewing and appraisal. Following the administration of a bolus plus infusion protocol, PET and fMRI data were simultaneously acquired in a hybrid 3 T MR-BrainPET.

Results: We found a differential correlation of BOLD percent signal change with [11C]flumazenil binding potential in the MPFC. Specifically, [11C]flumazenil binding potential in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC) correlated with passive viewing of emotionally valenced pictures. In contrast, the [11C]flumazenil binding potential and the BOLD signal induced by picture appraisal did show a correlation in the paracingulate gyrus.

Conclusion: Our data deliver first evidence for a relationship between MPFC GABAA receptors and emotion processing in the same region. Moreover, we observed that GABAA receptors appear to play different roles in emotion processing in the vMPFC (passive viewing) and paracingulate gyrus (appraisal).

References
1.
Buda M, Fornito A, Bergstrom Z, Simons J . A specific brain structural basis for individual differences in reality monitoring. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(40):14308-13. PMC: 3190297. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3595-11.2011. View

2.
Scheins J, Vahedipour K, Pietrzyk U, Shah N . High performance volume-of-intersection projectors for 3D-PET image reconstruction based on polar symmetries and SIMD vectorisation. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(24):9349-75. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/24/9349. View

3.
Wiebking C, Duncan N, Qin P, Hayes D, Lyttelton O, Gravel P . External awareness and GABA--a multimodal imaging study combining fMRI and [18F]flumazenil-PET. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012; 35(1):173-84. PMC: 6869063. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22166. View

4.
WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

5.
Feng L, Svarer C, Madsen K, Ziebell M, Dyssegaard A, Ettrup A . Design of Infusion Schemes for Neuroreceptor Imaging: Application to [(11)C]Flumazenil-PET Steady-State Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:9132840. PMC: 4830710. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9132840. View