» Articles » PMID: 26839561

Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Serum for Culturing the Supportive Feeder Cells of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines

Overview
Journal Stem Cells Int
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2016 Feb 4
PMID 26839561
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can proliferate robustly on the feeder-free culture system, genetic instability of hPSCs has been reported in such environment. Alternatively, feeder cells enable hPSCs to maintain their pluripotency. The feeder cells are usually grown in a culture medium containing fetal bovine serum (FBS) prior to coculture with hPSCs. The use of FBS might limit the clinical application of hPSCs. Recently, human cord blood-derived serum (hUCS) showed a positive effect on culture of mesenchymal stem cells. It is interesting to test whether hUCS can be used for culture of feeder cells of hPSCs. This study was aimed to replace FBS with hUCS for culturing the human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) prior to feeder cell preparation. The results showed that HFFs cultured in hUCS-containing medium (HFF-hUCS) displayed fibroblastic features, high proliferation rates, short population doubling times, and normal karyotypes after prolonged culture. Inactivated HFF-hUCS expressed important genes, including Activin A, FGF2, and TGFβ1, which have been implicated in the maintenance of hPSC pluripotency. Moreover, hPSC lines maintained pluripotency, differentiation capacities, and karyotypic stability after being cocultured for extended period with inactivated HFF-hUCS. Therefore, the results demonstrated the benefit of hUCS for hPSCs culture system.

Citing Articles

Regenerative Therapy Using Umbilical Cord Serum.

Maharajan N, Cho G, Choi J, Jang C In Vivo. 2021; 35(2):699-705.

PMID: 33622862 PMC: 8045055. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12310.


Cord blood serum harvesting by hydroxyethyl starch: a fetal bovine serum alternative in expansion of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Salavati Pour M, Vahidi R, Lashkari M, Derakhshani A, Ameri Z, Farsinejad A Cytotechnology. 2020; 72(4):551-567.

PMID: 32601794 PMC: 7450036. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-020-00404-9.

References
1.
Eiselleova L, Peterkova I, Neradil J, Slaninova I, Hampl A, Dvorak P . Comparative study of mouse and human feeder cells for human embryonic stem cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2008; 52(4):353-63. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.082590le. View

2.
Bieback K, Ha V, Hecker A, Grassl M, Kinzebach S, Solz H . Altered gene expression in human adipose stem cells cultured with fetal bovine serum compared to human supplements. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010; 16(11):3467-84. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0727. View

3.
Ueyama H, Horibe T, Hinotsu S, Tanaka T, Inoue T, Urushihara H . Chromosomal variability of human mesenchymal stem cells cultured under hypoxic conditions. J Cell Mol Med. 2011; 16(1):72-82. PMC: 3823094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01303.x. View

4.
Soteriou D, Iskender B, Byron A, Humphries J, Borg-Bartolo S, Haddock M . Comparative proteomic analysis of supportive and unsupportive extracellular matrix substrates for human embryonic stem cell maintenance. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288(26):18716-31. PMC: 3696646. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.463372. View

5.
Tannenbaum S, Turetsky T, Singer O, Aizenman E, Kirshberg S, Ilouz N . Derivation of xeno-free and GMP-grade human embryonic stem cells--platforms for future clinical applications. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e35325. PMC: 3380026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035325. View