Importance:
Genes may work by modulating the way individuals respond to environmental variation, and these discrete and differential genes vs environmental interactions may not be readily captured in simple association studies.
Objective:
To determine whether children carrying the 7-repeat allele of the DRD4 gene living under adverse economic conditions have worse-than-average fat intake compared with those living in a healthy environment.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Data from an established prospective birth cohort (Maternal Adversity, Vulnerability, and Neurodevelopment) were used to study 4-year-old children from Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. A total of 190 children (94 girls and 96 boys) had height and weight measured and complete food diaries and were therefore eligible for the study. The study is derived from a birth cohort started in June 2003 and still ongoing. The last age of follow-up was at 6 years.
Exposures:
Social environment was characterized based on the gross family income, and DNA was genotyped for the 7-repeat allele of the DRD4 gene.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Fat intake.
Results:
The 5 steps to distinguish the differential susceptibility from other types of interaction were followed, and the study confirms that differential susceptibility is a relevant model to address the association between the 7-repeat allele of DRD4 and food choices in girls. Of the 190 children, 112 did not have the DRD4 7-repeat allele and 78 did. Baseline characteristics did not differ in these 2 groups. Although not different in several confounders, such as maternal educational level, maternal smoking during gestation, birth weight, and breastfeeding duration, girls carrying the 7-repeat allele of the DRD4 gene and living in adverse socioeconomic conditions have increased fat intake compared with girls who are noncarriers (DRD4 7+ mean, 33.95% of calories derived from fat; 95% CI, 28.76%-39.13%; DRD4 7- mean, 28.76%; 95% CI, 26.77%-30.83%). However, girls carrying the 7-repeat allele of the same gene and living in better socioeconomic conditions have decreased fat intake compared with noncarriers (DRD4 7+ mean, 29.03% of calories derived from fat; 95% CI, 26.69%-31.51%; DRD4 7- mean, 31.88%; 95% CI, 30.28%-33.58%).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Alleles previously considered to be obesity risk alleles might in fact function as plasticity alleles, determining openness to environmental modification and/or intervention, as seen in the girls in this study. This finding has important implications for obesity prevention and social pediatrics.
Citing Articles
Allostatic load in children: The cost of empathic concern.
Phua D, Chen H, Yap F, Chong Y, Gluckman P, Broekman B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(39):e2217769120.
PMID: 37725642
PMC: 10523447.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2217769120.
Genetically-predicted prefrontal DRD4 gene expression modulates differentiated brain responses to food cues in adolescent girls and boys.
Portella A, Papantoni A, Joseph A, Chen L, Lee R, Silveira P
Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24094.
PMID: 34916545
PMC: 8677785.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02797-9.
Socioemotional Mechanisms of Children's Differential Response to the Effects of Maternal Sensitivity on Child Adjustment.
Somers J, Luecken L
Parent Sci Pract. 2021; 21(3):241-275.
PMID: 34483750
PMC: 8411900.
DOI: 10.1080/15295192.2020.1809955.
Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates real-world behavioural response to the food retail environment in children.
Paquet C, Portella A, Moore S, Ma Y, Dagher A, Meaney M
BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):145.
PMID: 33530977
PMC: 7856809.
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10160-w.
Temperament, socioeconomic adversity, and perinatal risk as related to preschoolers' BMI.
Martoccio T, Senehi N, Brophy-Herb H, Miller A, Contreras D, Horodynski M
Health Psychol. 2020; 40(2):135-144.
PMID: 33315417
PMC: 8363046.
DOI: 10.1037/hea0001052.
Underlying Susceptibility to Eating Disorders and Drug Abuse: Genetic and Pharmacological Aspects of Dopamine D4 Receptors.
Botticelli L, Micioni Di Bonaventura E, Del Bello F, Giorgioni G, Piergentili A, Romano A
Nutrients. 2020; 12(8).
PMID: 32751662
PMC: 7468707.
DOI: 10.3390/nu12082288.
Infants' Biological Sensitivity to the Effects of Maternal Social Support: Evidence Among Mexican American Families.
Somers J, Jewell S, Ibrahim M, Luecken L
Infancy. 2020; 24(2):275-296.
PMID: 32677201
PMC: 8952778.
DOI: 10.1111/infa.12266.
Predicted DRD4 prefrontal gene expression moderates snack intake and stress perception in response to the environment in adolescents.
Portella A, Papantoni A, Paquet C, Moore S, Rosch K, Mostofsky S
PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234601.
PMID: 32589693
PMC: 7319347.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234601.
Systemic F-Isoprostane Levels in Predisposition to Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: Emphasis on Racial Differences.
Ilyasova D, Wong B, Waterstone A, Kinev A, Okosun I
Divers Equal Health Care. 2020; 14(2):91-101.
PMID: 32523692
PMC: 7286608.
DOI: 10.21767/2049-5471.100098.
The gray matter volume of the temporoparietal junction varies across cultures: a moderating role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4).
Kitayama S, Yu Q, King A, Yoon C, Liberzon I
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020; 15(2):193-202.
PMID: 32300802
PMC: 7304516.
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa032.
Lifestyle intervention modifies the effect of the MC4R genotype on changes in insulin resistance among women with prior gestational diabetes: Tianjin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevention Program.
Chen Y, Liu H, Wang L, Zhou T, Liang Z, Li W
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019; 110(3):750-758.
PMID: 31271198
PMC: 6736191.
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz121.
Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of biomarkers of cardio-metabolic disease in South Korea: Comparison of the Health Examinees Study to a nationally representative survey.
Kim S, Oh J, Heo J, Lee H, Lee J, Subramanian S
PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195091.
PMID: 29668714
PMC: 5906014.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195091.
The moderating role of food cue sensitivity in the behavioral response of children to their neighborhood food environment: a cross-sectional study.
Paquet C, de Montigny L, Labban A, Buckeridge D, Ma Y, Arora N
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):86.
PMID: 28679391
PMC: 5499022.
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0540-9.
Dynamic interaction between fetal adversity and a genetic score reflecting dopamine function on developmental outcomes at 36 months.
Bischoff A, Pokhvisneva I, Leger E, Gaudreau H, Steiner M, Kennedy J
PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177344.
PMID: 28505190
PMC: 5432105.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177344.
Fat Tissue Accretion in Children and Adolescents: Interplay between Food Responsiveness, Gender, and the Home Availability of Snacks.
De Decker A, Verbeken S, Sioen I, Moens E, Braet C, de Henauw S
Front Psychol. 2017; 7:2041.
PMID: 28101078
PMC: 5209336.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02041.
Gene and environment interaction: Is the differential susceptibility hypothesis relevant for obesity?.
Dalle Molle R, Fatemi H, Dagher A, Levitan R, Silveira P, Dube L
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 73:326-339.
PMID: 28024828
PMC: 5283807.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.028.
Prenatal maternal depression and child serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) and dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) genotype predict negative emotionality from 3 to 36 months.
Green C, Babineau V, Jolicoeur-Martineau A, Bouvette-Turcot A, Minde K, Sassi R
Dev Psychopathol. 2016; 29(3):901-917.
PMID: 27427178
PMC: 5511040.
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579416000560.