» Articles » PMID: 26829260

The Role of External Features in Face Recognition with Central Vision Loss

Overview
Journal Optom Vis Sci
Date 2016 Feb 2
PMID 26829260
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated how the performance of recognizing familiar face images depends on the internal (eyebrows, eyes, nose, mouth) and external face features (chin, outline of face, hairline) in individuals with central vision loss.

Methods: In experiment 1, we measured eye movements for four observers with central vision loss to determine whether they fixated more often on the internal or the external features of face images while attempting to recognize the images. We then measured the accuracy for recognizing face images that contained only the internal, only the external, or both internal and external features (experiment 2) and for hybrid images where the internal and external features came from two different source images (experiment 3) for five observers with central vision loss and four age-matched control observers.

Results: When recognizing familiar face images, approximately 40% of the fixations of observers with central vision loss was centered on the external features of faces. The recognition accuracy was higher for images containing only external features (66.8 ± 3.3% correct) than for images containing only internal features (35.8 ± 15.0%), a finding contradicting that of control observers. For hybrid face images, observers with central vision loss responded more accurately to the external features (50.4 ± 17.8%) than to the internal features (9.3 ± 4.9%), whereas control observers did not show the same bias toward responding to the external features.

Conclusions: Contrary to people with normal vision who rely more on the internal features of face images for recognizing familiar faces, individuals with central vision loss show a higher dependence on using external features of face images.

Citing Articles

Face Recognition Characteristics in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Determined Using a Virtual Reality Headset with Eye Tracking.

Zugelj N, Peterlin L, Muznik U, Klobucar P, Jaki Mekjavic P, Vidovic Valentincic N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38276142 PMC: 10816606. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020636.


Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss.

Maniglia M, Visscher K, Seitz A Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:734970.

PMID: 34803584 PMC: 8599964. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.734970.


Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.

Verghese P, Vullings C, Shanidze N Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021; 7:773-791.

PMID: 34038144 PMC: 8916065. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100119-125555.


Mapping the binocular scotoma in macular degeneration.

Vullings C, Verghese P J Vis. 2021; 21(3):9.

PMID: 33666643 PMC: 7937995. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.3.9.


Orientation of the preferred retinal locus (PRL) is maintained following changes in simulated scotoma size.

Costela F, Reeves S, Woods R J Vis. 2021; 20(7):25.

PMID: 33555170 PMC: 7424101. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.7.25.


References
1.
Ellis H, Shepherd J, Davies G . Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception. 1979; 8(4):431-9. DOI: 10.1068/p080431. View

2.
Gale A, Findlay J . Eye movement strategies involved in face perception. Perception. 1977; 6(3):313-26. DOI: 10.1068/p060313. View

3.
Bruce V . Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol. 1982; 73(Pt 1):105-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x. View

4.
Daitch J, Green D . Contrast sensitivity of the human peripheral retina. Vision Res. 1969; 9(8):947-52. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90100-x. View

5.
Yu D, Chung S . Critical orientation for face identification in central vision loss. Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88(6):724-32. PMC: 3100384. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318213933c. View