» Articles » PMID: 34803584

Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2021 Nov 22
PMID 34803584
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pathologies affecting central vision, and macular degeneration (MD) in particular, represent a growing health concern worldwide, and the leading cause of blindness in the Western World. To cope with the loss of central vision, MD patients often develop compensatory strategies, such as the adoption of a Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL), which they use as a substitute fovea. However, visual acuity and fixation stability in the visual periphery are poorer, leaving many MD patients struggling with tasks such as reading and recognizing faces. Current non-invasive rehabilitative interventions are usually of two types: , aiming at training eye movements or teaching patients to use or develop a PRL, or , with the goal of improving visual abilities in the PRL. These training protocols are usually tested over a series of outcome assessments mainly measuring low-level visual abilities (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and reading. However, extant approaches lead to mixed success, and in general have exhibited large individual differences. Recent breakthroughs in vision science have shown that loss of central vision affects not only low-level visual abilities and oculomotor mechanisms, but also higher-level attentional and cognitive processes. We suggest that effective interventions for rehabilitation after central vision loss should then not only integrate low-level vision and oculomotor training, but also take into account higher level attentional and cognitive mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Clinical efficacy of a head-mounted device for central vision loss.

Gu X, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Zhao X, Chen Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21384.

PMID: 39271764 PMC: 11399288. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72331-0.


Hierarchical Bayesian Augmented Hebbian Reweighting Model of Perceptual Learning.

Lu Z, Yang S, Dosher B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149245 PMC: 11326272. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.08.606902.


The effect of duration between sessions on microperimetric biofeedback training in patients with maculopathies.

Zhou J, Hou J, Li S, Zhang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12524.

PMID: 38822030 PMC: 11143284. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63327-x.


Enabling identification of component processes in perceptual learning with nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian modeling.

Zhao Y, Liu J, Dosher B, Lu Z J Vis. 2024; 24(5):8.

PMID: 38780934 PMC: 11131338. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.5.8.


Current directions in visual perceptual learning.

Lu Z, Dosher B Nat Rev Psychol. 2023; 1(11):654-668.

PMID: 37274562 PMC: 10237053. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-022-00107-2.


References
1.
Xiao L, Zhang J, Wang R, Klein S, Levi D, Yu C . Complete transfer of perceptual learning across retinal locations enabled by double training. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(24):1922-6. PMC: 3045109. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.030. View

2.
Griffis J, Elkhetali A, Burge W, Chen R, Bowman A, Szaflarski J . Retinotopic patterns of functional connectivity between V1 and large-scale brain networks during resting fixation. Neuroimage. 2016; 146:1071-1083. PMC: 5318284. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.035. View

3.
CHAPANIS A . Relationships between age, visual acuity and color vision. Hum Biol. 1950; 22(1):1-33. View

4.
Karni A, Sagi D . Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(11):4966-70. PMC: 51788. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4966. View

5.
Crossland M, Crabb D, Rubin G . Task-specific fixation behavior in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 52(1):411-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5473. View