» Articles » PMID: 26827182

GRADE: Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Environmental and Occupational Health

Abstract

There is high demand in environmental health for adoption of a structured process that evaluates and integrates evidence while making decisions and recommendations transparent. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework holds promise to address this demand. For over a decade, GRADE has been applied successfully to areas of clinical medicine, public health, and health policy, but experience with GRADE in environmental and occupational health is just beginning. Environmental and occupational health questions focus on understanding whether an exposure is a potential health hazard or risk, assessing the exposure to understand the extent and magnitude of risk, and exploring interventions to mitigate exposure or risk. Although GRADE offers many advantages, including its flexibility and methodological rigor, there are features of the different sources of evidence used in environmental and occupational health that will require further consideration to assess the need for method refinement. An issue that requires particular attention is the evaluation and integration of evidence from human, animal, in vitro, and in silico (computer modeling) studies when determining whether an environmental factor represents a potential health hazard or risk. Assessment of the hazard of exposures can produce analyses for use in the GRADE evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework to inform risk-management decisions about removing harmful exposures or mitigating risks. The EtD framework allows for grading the strength of the recommendations based on judgments of the certainty in the evidence (also known as quality of the evidence), as well as other factors that inform recommendations such as social values and preferences, resource implications, and benefits. GRADE represents an untapped opportunity for environmental and occupational health to make evidence-based recommendations in a systematic and transparent manner. The objectives of this article are to provide an overview of GRADE, discuss GRADE's applicability to environmental health, and identify priority areas for method assessment and development.

Citing Articles

Indoor radon exposure: A systematic review of radon-induced health risks and evidence quality using GRADE approach.

Mphaga K, Utembe W, Mbonane T, Rathebe P Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40439.

PMID: 39654791 PMC: 11625298. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40439.


A Meta-Analysis of Association Between Interleukin Polymorphisms (rs4073, rs1800925, rs1179251, rs1179246, rs2227485, rs17855750, and rs153109) and Colorectal Cancer Risk.

Sadafi S, Amirifard N, Aleagha O, Mirbahari S, Sadeghi M Biochem Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39548028 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10969-1.


Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter and Mortality: An Update of the WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Orellano P, Kasdagli M, Perez Velasco R, Samoli E Int J Public Health. 2024; 69:1607683.

PMID: 39399882 PMC: 11466858. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607683.


Pharmaceutical products, drugs and personal care products in European waters: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Serrano Valera M, Martinez-Alcala I, Piuvezam G, Mateo-Ramirez F, Pimenta I, Vela N PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308975.

PMID: 39172921 PMC: 11340940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308975.


Preclinical assessment for translation to humans: The PATH approach for assessing supporting evidence for early-phase trials and innovative care.

Kimmelman J, Bodilly Kane P, Bicer S, Carlisle B Med. 2024; 5(10):1227-1236.

PMID: 39116871 PMC: 11471378. DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.07.014.


References
1.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G . GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4):395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. View

2.
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt G, Henry D, Hill S . Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4(1):38. PMC: 545647. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38. View

3.
Schunemann H, Hill S, Guyatt G, Akl E, Ahmed F . The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010; 65(5):392-5. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.119933. View

4.
Murray H, Thayer K . Implementing systematic review in toxicological profiles: ATSDR and NIEHS/NTP collaboration. J Environ Health. 2014; 76(8):34-5. PMC: 5685487. View

5.
Mandrioli D, Silbergeld E . Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 2015; 124(1):6-11. PMC: 4710610. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509880. View