» Articles » PMID: 26822227

Combining Regenerative Medicine Strategies to Provide Durable Reconstructive Options: Auricular Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Jan 30
PMID 26822227
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in regenerative medicine place us in a unique position to improve the quality of engineered tissue. We use auricular cartilage as an exemplar to illustrate how the use of tissue-specific adult stem cells, assembly through additive manufacturing and improved understanding of postnatal tissue maturation will allow us to more accurately replicate native tissue anisotropy. This review highlights the limitations of autologous auricular reconstruction, including donor site morbidity, technical considerations and long-term complications. Current tissue-engineered auricular constructs implanted into immune-competent animal models have been observed to undergo inflammation, fibrosis, foreign body reaction, calcification and degradation. Combining biomimetic regenerative medicine strategies will allow us to improve tissue-engineered auricular cartilage with respect to biochemical composition and functionality, as well as microstructural organization and overall shape. Creating functional and durable tissue has the potential to shift the paradigm in reconstructive surgery by obviating the need for donor sites.

Citing Articles

Small spheroids for head and neck cartilage tissue engineering.

Reutter S, Kern J, Jakob Y, Rotter N, Gvaramia D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):32114.

PMID: 39738737 PMC: 11686322. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83847-w.


Evaluation of Bioprinted Autologous Cartilage Grafts in an Immunocompetent Rabbit Model.

Gvaramia D, Fisch P, Flegeau K, Huber L, Kern J, Jakob Y Adv Ther (Weinh). 2024; 7(6).

PMID: 39713175 PMC: 7617253. DOI: 10.1002/adtp.202300441.


Nasoseptal chondroprogenitors isolated through fibronectin-adherence confer no biological advantage for cartilage tissue engineering compared to nasoseptal chondrocytes.

Jovic T, Thomson E, Jones N, Thornton C, Doak S, Whitaker I Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1421111.

PMID: 39391600 PMC: 11464323. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1421111.


3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.

Gao S, Nie T, Lin Y, Jiang L, Wang L, Wu J Mater Today Bio. 2024; 27:101141.

PMID: 39045312 PMC: 11265588. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101141.


Endocrine Petrified Ear: Associated Endocrine Conditions in Auricular Calcification/Ossification (A Sample-Focused Analysis).

Valea A, Nistor C, Ciobica M, Sima O, Carsote M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38928718 PMC: 11202653. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121303.


References
1.
Kamil S, Vacanti M, Aminuddin B, Jackson M, Vacanti C, Eavey R . Tissue engineering of a human sized and shaped auricle using a mold. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114(5):867-70. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200405000-00015. View

2.
Wellisz T . Reconstruction of the burned external ear using a Medpor porous polyethylene pivoting helix framework. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91(5):811-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00009. View

3.
Steffen A, Magritz R, Frenzel H, Edwards T, Siegert R . Psychometric validation of the youth quality of life-facial differences questionnaire in patients following ear reconstruction with rib cartilage in microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 129(1):184e-186e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182365e6d. View

4.
Reinisch J, Lewin S . Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap. Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 25(3):181-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239448. View

5.
Williams R, Khan I, Richardson K, Nelson L, McCarthy H, Analbelsi T . Identification and clonal characterisation of a progenitor cell sub-population in normal human articular cartilage. PLoS One. 2010; 5(10):e13246. PMC: 2954799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013246. View