» Articles » PMID: 26821869

Triploid Human Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Tripronuclear Zygotes Displayed Pluripotency and Trophoblast Differentiation Ability Similar to the Diploid Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview
Journal J Reprod Dev
Date 2016 Jan 30
PMID 26821869
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because the diploid human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be successfully derived from tripronuclear zygotes thus, they can serve as an alternative source of derivation of normal karyotype hESC lines. The aim of the present study was to compare the pluripotency and trophoblast differentiation ability of hESCs derived from tripronuclear zygotes and diploid hESCs. In the present study, a total of 20 tripronuclear zygotes were cultured; 8 zygotes developed to the blastocyst stage and 1 hESC line was generated. Unlike the previous studies, chromosomal correction of tripronuclear zygotes during derivation of hESCs did not occur. The established line carries 3 sets of chromosomes and showed a numerical aberration. Although the cell line displayed an abnormal chromosome number, it was found the cell line has been shown to be pluripotent with the ability to differentiate into 3 embryonic germ layers both in vitro and in vivo. The expression of X inactive specific transcript (XIST) in mid-passage (passage 42) of undifferentiated triploid hESCs was detected, indicating X chromosome inactivation of the cell line. Moreover, when this cell line was induced to differentiate toward the trophoblast lineage, morphological and functional trophoblast cells were observed, similar to the diploid hESC line.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Four Protocols for In Vitro Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Trophoblast Lineages by BMP4 and Dual Inhibition of Activin/Nodal and FGF2 Signaling.

Anvar Z, Chakchouk I, Sharif M, Mahadevan S, Su L, Anikar S Reprod Sci. 2023; 31(1):173-189.

PMID: 37658178 PMC: 10784360. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01334-5.


Generation, genomic characterization, and differentiation of triploid human embryonic stem cells.

Haim-Abadi G, Golan-Lev T, Koren A, Benvenisty N Stem Cell Reports. 2023; 18(5):1049-1060.

PMID: 37116485 PMC: 10202691. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.04.001.


Stem Cell-Based Trophoblast Models to Unravel the Genetic Causes of Human Miscarriages.

Nikitina T, Lebedev I Cells. 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 35741051 PMC: 9221414. DOI: 10.3390/cells11121923.


Derivation of human triploid trophoblast stem cells.

Kong X, Chen X, Ou S, Wang W, Li R J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(5):1183-1193.

PMID: 35243570 PMC: 9107551. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02436-w.


Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal-Like Cells from Diploid and Triploid Human Embryonic Stem Cells Display Different Gene Expression Profiles.

Javidpou M, Seifati S, Farashahi-Yazd E, Hajizadeh-Tafti F, Golzadeh J, Akyash F Iran Biomed J. 2021; 25(2):99-105.

PMID: 33465842 PMC: 7921525. DOI: 10.29252/ibj.25.2.99.


References
1.
Ezashi T, Telugu B, Roberts R . Model systems for studying trophoblast differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2012; 349(3):809-24. PMC: 3429771. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-012-1371-2. View

2.
Barak Y, Kogosowski A, Goldman S, Soffer Y, Gonen Y, Tesarik J . Pregnancy and birth after transfer of embryos that developed from single-nucleated zygotes obtained by injection of round spermatids into oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70(1):67-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00106-x. View

3.
Marchand M, Horcajadas J, Esteban F, McElroy S, Fisher S, Giudice L . Transcriptomic signature of trophoblast differentiation in a human embryonic stem cell model. Biol Reprod. 2011; 84(6):1258-71. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086413. View

4.
Huan Q, Gao X, Wang Y, Shen Y, Ma W, Chen Z . Comparative evaluation of human embryonic stem cell lines derived from zygotes with normal and abnormal pronuclei. Dev Dyn. 2009; 239(2):425-38. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.22175. View

5.
Bradley C, Scott H, Chami O, Peura T, Dumevska B, Schmidt U . Derivation of Huntington's disease-affected human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells Dev. 2010; 20(3):495-502. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2010.0120. View