» Articles » PMID: 26793219

Differential Toxicity of Bare and Hybrid ZnO Nanoparticles in Green Pea (Pisum Sativum L.): A Life Cycle Study

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2016 Jan 22
PMID 26793219
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of surface or lattice modification of nanoparticles (NPs) on terrestrial plants is poorly understood. We investigated the impact of different zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs on green pea (Pisum sativum L.), one of the highest consumed legumes globally. Pea plants were grown for 65 d in soil amended with commercially available bare ZnO NPs (10 nm), 2 wt% alumina doped (Al2O3@ZnO NPs, 15 nm), or 1 wt% aminopropyltriethoxysilane coated NPs (KH550@ZnO NP, 20 nm) at 250 and 1000 mg NP/kg soil inside a greenhouse. Bulk (ZnO) and ionic Zn (zinc chloride) were included as controls. Plant fresh and dry biomass, changes in leaf pigment concentrations, elements (Zn, Al, Si), and protein and carbohydrate profile of green pees were quantified upon harvest at 65 days. With the exception of the coated 1000 mg/kg NP treatment, fresh and dry weight were unaffected by Zn exposure. Although, all treated plants showed higher tissue Zn than controls, those exposed to Al2O3@ZnO NPs at 1000 mg/kg had greater Zn concentration in roots and seeds, compared to bulk Zn and the other NP treatments, keeping Al and Si uptake largely unaffected. Higher Zn accumulation in green pea seeds were resulted in coated ZnO at 250 mg/kg treatments. In leaves, Al2O3@ZnO NP at 250 mg/kg significantly increased Chl-a and carotenoid concentrations relative to the bulk, ionic, and the other NP treatments. The protein and carbohydrate profiles remained largely unaltered across all treatments with the exception of Al2O3@ZnO NPs at 1000 mg/kg where sucrose concentration of green peas increased significantly, which is likely a biomarker of stress. Importantly, these findings demonstrate that lattice and surface modification can significantly alter the fate and phytotoxic effects of ZnO NPs in food crops and seed nutritional quality. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of a life cycle study on comparative toxicity of bare, coated, and doped ZnO NPs on a soil-grown food crop.

Citing Articles

Favorable physiological and morphological effects of molybdenum nanoparticles on tobacco ( L.): root irrigation is superior to foliar spraying.

Chen J, Yin Y, Zhu Y, Song K, Ding W Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1220109.

PMID: 37719206 PMC: 10501311. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220109.


Impacts of ZnO as a nanofertilizer on fenugreek: some biochemical parameters and SCoT analysis.

Elsherif D, Abd-ElShafy E, Khalifa A J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2023; 21(1):52.

PMID: 37126122 PMC: 10151287. DOI: 10.1186/s43141-023-00501-0.


Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized from leaf extract on growth and antioxidant properties of mustard ().

Geremew A, Carson L, Woldesenbet S, Wang H, Reeves S, Brooks Jr N Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1108186.

PMID: 36755696 PMC: 9900026. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1108186.


Development and testing of zinc sulfate and zinc oxide nanoparticle-coated urea fertilizer to improve N and Zn use efficiency.

Beig B, Niazi M, Jahan Z, Haider G, Zia M, Shah G Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1058219.

PMID: 36733597 PMC: 9886897. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1058219.


Ameliorating Drought Effects in Wheat Using an Exclusive or Co-Applied Rhizobacteria and ZnO Nanoparticles.

Muhammad F, Raza M, Iqbal R, Zulfiqar F, Aslam M, Yong J Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 36358265 PMC: 9687648. DOI: 10.3390/biology11111564.


References
1.
Bonnet M, Camares O, Veisseire P . Effects of zinc and influence of Acremonium lolii on growth parameters, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv Apollo). J Exp Bot. 2000; 51(346):945-53. View

2.
Lin D, Xing B . Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42(15):5580-5. DOI: 10.1021/es800422x. View

3.
Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J . Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(7):823-39. PMC: 1257642. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7339. View

4.
Du W, Sun Y, Ji R, Zhu J, Wu J, Guo H . TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. J Environ Monit. 2011; 13(4):822-8. DOI: 10.1039/c0em00611d. View

5.
Zhao L, Sun Y, Hernandez-Viezcas J, Servin A, Hong J, Niu G . Influence of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on cucumber physiological markers and bioaccumulation of Ce and Zn: a life cycle study. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61(49):11945-51. DOI: 10.1021/jf404328e. View