Correlates of Agreement Between Accelerometry and Self-reported Physical Activity
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Understanding factors that influence accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to measurement development, epidemiologic studies, and interventions. This study examined agreement between self-reported (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form [IPAQ-LF]) and accelerometry-based estimates of PA and SB across six countries and identified correlates of between-method agreement.
Methods: Self-report and objective (accelerometry-based) PA and SB data were collected in 2002-2011 from 3865 adult participants in eight cities from six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Between-method relative agreement (correlation) and absolute disagreement (mean difference between conceptually and intensity-matched IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) were estimated. Also, sociodemographic characteristics and PA patterns were examined as correlates of between-method agreement.
Results: Observed relative agreement (relationships of IPAQ-LF with accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) was small to moderate (r = 0.05-0.37) and was moderated by sociodemographic (age, sex, weight status, and education) and behavioral (PA-type) factors. The absolute disagreement was large, with participants self-reporting higher PA intensity and total time in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA than accelerometry. Also, self-reported sitting time was lower than accelerometry-based sedentary behavior. After adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral factors, the absolute disagreement between pairs of IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA variables remained significantly different across cities/countries.
Conclusions: Present findings suggest systematic cultural and/or linguistic and sociodemographic differences in absolute agreement between the IPAQ-LF and the accelerometry-based PA and SB variables. These results have implications for the interpretation of international PA and SB data and correlate/determinant studies. They call for further efforts to improve such measures.
Monacis D, Sannicandro I, Colella D Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).
PMID: 40003306 PMC: 11854344. DOI: 10.3390/children12020204.
Johnson J, Zawadzki M, Sliwinski M, Almeida D, Buxton O, Conroy D JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e58985.
PMID: 39842791 PMC: 11799819. DOI: 10.2196/58985.
Onyeaka H, Zambrano J, Szlyk H, Celano C, Baiden P, Muoghalu C Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025; 19(1):129-137.
PMID: 39822316 PMC: 11733101. DOI: 10.1177/15598276221116081.
Zieff G, Bancks M, Pettee Gabriel K, Gibbs B, Moore J, Reis J Ann Behav Med. 2024; 59(1).
PMID: 39671511 PMC: 11761680. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae074.
Reassessing green exercise research: unveiling methodological gaps and pathways for progress.
Laezza L, De Dominicis S, Brondino M Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1449059.
PMID: 39629224 PMC: 11611549. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1449059.