» Articles » PMID: 26782964

Protein Patterning by Microcontact Printing Using Pyramidal PDMS Stamps

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 20
PMID 26782964
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Micro-contact printing, μCP, is a well-established soft-lithography technique for printing biomolecules. μCP uses stamps made of Poly(dimethylsiloxane), PDMS, made by replicating a microstructured silicon master fabricated by semiconductor manufacturing processes. One of the problems of the μCP is the difficult control of the printing process, which, because of the high compressibility of PDMS, is very sensitive to minute changes in the applied pressure. This over-sensitive response leads to frequent and/or uncontrollable collapse of the stamps with high aspect ratios, thus decreasing the printing accuracy and reproducibility. Here we present a straightforward methodology of designing and fabricating PDMS structures with an architecture which uses the collapse of the stamp to reduce, rather than enlarge the variability of the printing. The PDMS stamp, organized as an array of pyramidal micro-posts, whose ceiling collapses when pressed on a flat surface, replicates the structure of the silicon master fabricated by anisotropic wet etching. Upon application of pressure, depending on the size of, and the pitch between, the PDMS pyramids, an air gap is formed surrounding either the entire array, or individual posts. The printing technology, which also exhibits a remarkably low background noise for fluorescence detection, may find applications when the clear demarcation of the shapes of protein patterns and the distance between them are critical, such as microarrays and studies of cell patterning.

Citing Articles

Protein Orientation and Polymer Phase Separation Induced by Poly(methyl methacrylate) Tacticity.

Janiszewska N, Raczkowska J, Gajos K, Awsiuk K Langmuir. 2025; 41(5):3549-3560.

PMID: 39898608 PMC: 11823595. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04699.


Plasma Treatment of PDMS for Microcontact Printing (μCP) of Lectins Decreases Silicone Transfer and Increases the Adhesion of Bladder Cancer Cells.

Zemla J, Szydlak R, Gajos K, Kozlowski L, Zielinski T, Luty M ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023; .

PMID: 37889219 PMC: 10636731. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c09195.


Hydrophobic Recovery of PDMS Surfaces in Contact with Hydrophilic Entities: Relevance to Biomedical Devices.

Tsuzuki T, Baassiri K, Mahmoudi Z, Perumal A, Rajendran K, Rubies G Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(6).

PMID: 35329765 PMC: 8950181. DOI: 10.3390/ma15062313.


Advances in Single-Cell Printing.

Zhou X, Wu H, Wen H, Zheng B Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35056245 PMC: 8778191. DOI: 10.3390/mi13010080.


Digitally Driven Aerosol Jet Printing to Enable Customisable Neuronal Guidance.

Capel A, Smith M, Taccola S, Pardo-Figuerez M, Rimington R, Lewis M Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:722294.

PMID: 34527674 PMC: 8435718. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.722294.


References
1.
Kane R, Takayama S, Ostuni E, Ingber D, Whitesides G . Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(23-24):2363-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00165-9. View

2.
Allison D, Cui X, Page G, Sabripour M . Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 7(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1749. View

3.
Chin C, Linder V, Sia S . Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip. 2012; 12(12):2118-34. DOI: 10.1039/c2lc21204h. View

4.
Duffy D, McDonald J, Schueller O, Whitesides G . Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem. 2011; 70(23):4974-84. DOI: 10.1021/ac980656z. View

5.
Decre M, Timmermans P, van der Sluis O, Schroeders R . Numerical and experimental study of critical roof collapse conditions in soft lithography. Langmuir. 2005; 21(17):7971-8. DOI: 10.1021/la050709p. View