» Articles » PMID: 26733906

Altered Statistical Learning and Decision-Making in Methamphetamine Dependence: Evidence from a Two-Armed Bandit Task

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Jan 7
PMID 26733906
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding how humans weigh long-term and short-term goals is important for both basic cognitive science and clinical neuroscience, as substance users need to balance the appeal of an immediate high vs. the long-term goal of sobriety. We use a computational model to identify learning and decision-making abnormalities in methamphetamine-dependent individuals (MDI, n = 16) vs. healthy control subjects (HCS, n = 16), in a two-armed bandit task. In this task, subjects repeatedly choose between two arms with fixed but unknown reward rates. Each choice not only yields potential immediate reward but also information useful for long-term reward accumulation, thus pitting exploration against exploitation. We formalize the task as comprising a learning component, the updating of estimated reward rates based on ongoing observations, and a decision-making component, the choice among options based on current beliefs and uncertainties about reward rates. We model the learning component as iterative Bayesian inference (the Dynamic Belief Model), and the decision component using five competing decision policies: Win-stay/Lose-shift (WSLS), ε-Greedy, τ-Switch, Softmax, Knowledge Gradient. HCS and MDI significantly differ in how they learn about reward rates and use them to make decisions. HCS learn from past observations but weigh recent data more, and their decision policy is best fit as Softmax. MDI are more likely to follow the simple learning-independent policy of WSLS, and among MDI best fit by Softmax, they have more pessimistic prior beliefs about reward rates and are less likely to choose the option estimated to be most rewarding. Neurally, MDI's tendency to avoid the most rewarding option is associated with a lower gray matter volume of the thalamic dorsal lateral nucleus. More broadly, our work illustrates the ability of our computational framework to help reveal subtle learning and decision-making abnormalities in substance use.

Citing Articles

Examining neuroanatomical correlates of win-stay, lose-shift behaviour.

Westerman M, Hallam G, Kafkas A, Brown H, Retzler C Brain Struct Funct. 2025; 230(2):40.

PMID: 40014138 PMC: 11868257. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-025-02901-z.


Adaptive Changes in Group 2 Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Underlie the Deficit in Recognition Memory Induced by Methamphetamine in Mice.

Busceti C, Di Menna L, Castaldi S, DErrico G, Taddeucci A, Bruno V eNeuro. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 38969501 PMC: 11298959. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0523-23.2024.


Motivational context and neurocomputation of stop expectation moderate early attention responses supporting proactive inhibitory control.

Gupta R, Simmons A, Dugas N, Stout D, Harle K Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1357868.

PMID: 38628969 PMC: 11019005. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1357868.


Model-based and model-free mechanisms in methamphetamine use disorder.

Robinson A, Mahlberg J, Chong T, Verdejo-Garcia A Addict Biol. 2024; 29(1):e13356.

PMID: 38221809 PMC: 10898847. DOI: 10.1111/adb.13356.


Gamma oscillations in visual statistical learning correlate with individual behavioral differences.

Saringer S, Feher A, Sary G, Kaposvari P Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1285773.

PMID: 38025386 PMC: 10663268. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1285773.


References
1.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8. View

2.
Hoffman W, Moore M, Templin R, McFarland B, Hitzemann R, Mitchell S . Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 188(2):162-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0494-0. View

3.
Kaitz S, Robertson R . Thalamic connections with limbic cortex. II. Corticothalamic projections. J Comp Neurol. 1981; 195(3):527-45. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901950309. View

4.
Maguire E, Valentine E, Wilding J, Kapur N . Routes to remembering: the brains behind superior memory. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 6(1):90-5. DOI: 10.1038/nn988. View

5.
van der Plas E, Crone E, van den Wildenberg W, Tranel D, Bechara A . Executive control deficits in substance-dependent individuals: a comparison of alcohol, cocaine, and methamphetamine and of men and women. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008; 31(6):706-19. PMC: 2829119. DOI: 10.1080/13803390802484797. View