» Articles » PMID: 26725258

Life Stage, Not Climate Change, Explains Observed Tree Range Shifts

Overview
Journal Glob Chang Biol
Date 2016 Jan 5
PMID 26725258
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ongoing climate change is expected to shift tree species distribution and therefore affect forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. To assess and project tree distributional shifts, researchers may compare the distribution of juvenile and adult trees under the assumption that differences between tree life stages reflect distributional shifts triggered by climate change. However, the distribution of tree life stages could differ within the lifespan of trees, therefore, we hypothesize that currently observed distributional differences could represent shifts over ontogeny as opposed to climatically driven changes. Here, we test this hypothesis with data from 1435 plots resurveyed after more than three decades across the Western Carpathians. We compared seedling, sapling and adult distribution of 12 tree species along elevation, temperature and precipitation gradients. We analyzed (i) temporal shifts between the surveys and (ii) distributional differences between tree life stages within both surveys. Despite climate warming, tree species distribution of any life stage did not shift directionally upward along elevation between the surveys. Temporal elevational shifts were species specific and an order of magnitude lower than differences among tree life stages within the surveys. Our results show that the observed range shifts among tree life stages are more consistent with ontogenetic differences in the species' environmental requirements than with responses to recent climate change. The distribution of seedlings substantially differed from saplings and adults, while the distribution of saplings did not differ from adults, indicating a critical transition between seedling and sapling tree life stages. Future research has to take ontogenetic differences among life stages into account as we found that distributional differences recently observed worldwide may not reflect climate change but rather the different environmental requirements of tree life stages.

Citing Articles

North American tree migration paced by climate in the West, lagging in the East.

Sharma S, Andrus R, Bergeron Y, Bogdziewicz M, Bragg D, Brockway D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(3).

PMID: 34983867 PMC: 8784119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2116691118.


Ontogenetic niche shifts in a locally endangered tree species (Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata) in a disturbed forest in Northern Ethiopia: Implications for conservation.

Ourge Wegasie M, Klanderud K, Totland O, Eldegard K PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0256843.

PMID: 34591856 PMC: 8483397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256843.


Tree recruitment is determined by stand structure and shade tolerance with uncertain role of climate and water relations.

Kaber Y, Meyer P, Stillhard J, De Lombaerde E, Zell J, Stadelmann G Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(17):12182-12203.

PMID: 34522370 PMC: 8427579. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7984.


The Concentration of Non-structural Carbohydrates, N, and P in Does Not Decline Toward Its Northernmost Distribution Range Along a 1500 km Transect in China.

Liu J, Deng Y, Wang X, Ni Y, Wang Q, Xiao W Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:1444.

PMID: 30386352 PMC: 6199963. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01444.


Tree Wave Migration Across an Elevation Gradient in the Altai Mountains, Siberia.

Kharuk V, Im S, Dvinskaya M, Ranson K, Petrov I J Mt Sci. 2018; 14(3):442-452.

PMID: 30008735 PMC: 6039980. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-016-4286-7.


References
1.
Nakashizuka T . Species coexistence in temperate, mixed deciduous forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(4):205-210. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02117-6. View

2.
Davis M, Shaw R . Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science. 2001; 292(5517):673-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.292.5517.673. View

3.
Akselsson C, Ardo J, Sverdrup H . Critical loads of acidity for forest soils and relationship to forest decline in the northern Czech Republic. Environ Monit Assess. 2004; 98(1-3):363-79. DOI: 10.1023/b:emas.0000038196.53204.ab. View

4.
Breshears D, Cobb N, Rich P, Price K, Allen C, Balice R . Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(42):15144-8. PMC: 1250231. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505734102. View

5.
Pearman P, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin C . Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(3):149-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005. View