» Articles » PMID: 25611188

Predicting Changes in the Distribution and Abundance of Species Under Environmental Change

Overview
Journal Ecol Lett
Date 2015 Jan 23
PMID 25611188
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Environmental changes are expected to alter both the distribution and the abundance of organisms. A disproportionate amount of past work has focused on distribution only, either documenting historical range shifts or predicting future occurrence patterns. However, simultaneous predictions of abundance and distribution across landscapes would be far more useful. To critically assess which approaches represent advances towards the goal of joint predictions of abundance and distribution, we review recent work on changing distributions and on effects of environmental drivers on single populations. Several methods have been used to predict changing distributions. Some of these can be easily modified to also predict abundance, but others cannot. In parallel, demographers have developed a much better understanding of how changing abiotic and biotic drivers will influence growth rate and abundance in single populations. However, this demographic work has rarely taken a landscape perspective and has largely ignored the effects of intraspecific density. We advocate a synthetic approach in which population models accounting for both density dependence and effects of environmental drivers are used to make integrated predictions of equilibrium abundance and distribution across entire landscapes. Such predictions would constitute an important step forward in assessing the ecological consequences of environmental changes.

Citing Articles

Predicting climate-driven shift of the East Mediterranean endemic Lindl.

Bedair H, Hazzazi Y, Abo Hatab A, Halmy M, Dakhil M, Alghariani M Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1461639.

PMID: 40051872 PMC: 11882879. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1461639.


Quantitative assessment of past variations in Sphagnum bog community structure using paleo-species distribution modeling.

Ryberg E, Valdes A, Ehrlen J, Valiranta M, Kylander M Ecology. 2025; 106(3):e70033.

PMID: 40028704 PMC: 11874255. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.70033.


Local Adaptation Is Highest in Populations With Stable Long-Term Growth.

Carley L, Geber M, Morris W, Eckhart V, Moeller D Ecol Lett. 2025; 28(2):e70071.

PMID: 39964071 PMC: 11834371. DOI: 10.1111/ele.70071.


Changes in reproduction mediate the effects of climate change and grassland management on plant population dynamics.

Andrzejak M, Knight T, Plos C, Korell L Ecol Appl. 2024; 35(1):e3063.

PMID: 39648627 PMC: 11737008. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3063.


The Activity Patterns and Grouping Characteristics of the Remaining Goitered Gazelle () in an Isolated Habitat of Western China.

Peng D, Zhang Z, Chen J, Meng D, Liang Y, Hu T Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39199872 PMC: 11350692. DOI: 10.3390/ani14162338.


References
1.
Holt R . Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106 Suppl 2:19659-65. PMC: 2780934. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905137106. View

2.
Brown G . Patterns and causes of demographic variation in a harvested moose population: evidence for the effects of climate and density-dependent drivers. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80(6):1288-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01875.x. View

3.
Dalgleish H, Koons D, Hooten M, Moffet C, Adler P . Climate influences the demography of three dominant sagebrush steppe plants. Ecology. 2011; 92(1):75-85. DOI: 10.1890/10-0780.1. View

4.
Rees M, Childs D, Ellner S . Building integral projection models: a user's guide. J Anim Ecol. 2013; 83(3):528-45. PMC: 4258094. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12178. View

5.
Araujo M, Peterson A . Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology. 2012; 93(7):1527-39. DOI: 10.1890/11-1930.1. View