» Articles » PMID: 26720096

Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2016 Jan 1
PMID 26720096
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Musculoskeletal models are powerful tools that allow biomechanical investigations and predictions of muscle forces not accessible with experiments. A core challenge modelers must confront is validation. Measurements of muscle activity and joint loading are used for qualitative and indirect validation of muscle force predictions. Subject-specific models have reached high levels of complexity and can predict contact loads with surprising accuracy. However, every deterministic musculoskeletal model contains an intrinsic uncertainty due to the high number of parameters not identifiable in vivo. The objective of this work is to test the impact of intrinsic uncertainty in a scaled-generic model on estimates of muscle and joint loads. Uncertainties in marker placement, limb coronal alignment, body segment parameters, Hill-type muscle parameters, and muscle geometry were modeled with a global probabilistic approach (multiple uncertainties included in a single analysis). 5-95% confidence bounds and input/output sensitivities of predicted knee compressive loads and varus/valgus contact moments were estimated for a gait activity of three subjects with telemetric knee implants from the "Grand Challenge Competition." Compressive load predicted for the three subjects showed confidence bounds of 333 ± 248 N, 408 ± 333 N, and 379 ± 244 N when all the sources of uncertainty were included. The measured loads lay inside the predicted 5-95% confidence bounds for 77%, 83%, and 76% of the stance phase. Muscle maximum isometric force, muscle geometry, and marker placement uncertainty most impacted the joint load results. This study demonstrated that identification of these parameters is crucial when subject-specific models are developed.

Citing Articles

Motoneuron-driven computational muscle modelling with motor unit resolution and subject-specific musculoskeletal anatomy.

Caillet A, Phillips A, Farina D, Modenese L PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(12):e1011606.

PMID: 38060619 PMC: 10729998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011606.


Muscle-driven simulations and experimental data of cycling.

Clancy C, Gatti A, Ong C, Maly M, Delp S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21534.

PMID: 38057337 PMC: 10700567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47945-5.


Reproducibility in modeling and simulation of the knee: Academic, industry, and regulatory perspectives.

Imhauser C, Baumann A, Liu X, Bischoff J, Verdonschot N, Fregly B J Orthop Res. 2023; 41(12):2569-2578.

PMID: 37350016 PMC: 11345941. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25652.


The Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Parameters on Inverse Dynamics: A Probabilistic Analysis.

Gaffney B, Christiansen C, Murray A, Myers C, Laz P, Davidson B J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif. 2022; 2(3):0310031-310038.

PMID: 35832400 PMC: 8597549. DOI: 10.1115/1.4038175.


Uncertainty in Muscle-Tendon Parameters can Greatly Influence the Accuracy of Knee Contact Force Estimates of Musculoskeletal Models.

Nasab S, Smith C, Maas A, Vollenweider A, Dymke J, Schutz P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:808027.

PMID: 35721846 PMC: 9204520. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.808027.


References
1.
Correa T, Pandy M . A mass-length scaling law for modeling muscle strength in the lower limb. J Biomech. 2011; 44(16):2782-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.024. View

2.
White S, Yack H, Winter D . A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model for gait analysis. Anatomical variability estimates. J Biomech. 1989; 22(8-9):885-93. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90072-9. View

3.
Martelli S, Calvetti D, Somersalo E, Viceconti M . Stochastic modelling of muscle recruitment during activity. Interface Focus. 2015; 5(2):20140094. PMC: 4342951. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2014.0094. View

4.
Van Arkel R, Modenese L, Phillips A, Jeffers J . Hip abduction can prevent posterior edge loading of hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 2013; 31(8):1172-9. PMC: 3736148. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22364. View

5.
Duprey S, Cheze L, Dumas R . Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization. J Biomech. 2010; 43(14):2858-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.010. View