» Articles » PMID: 33030199

Predictions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Dynamics From Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Models and Dynamic Biplane Radiography

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2020 Oct 8
PMID 33030199
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vivo knee ligament forces are important to consider for informing rehabilitation or clinical interventions. However, they are difficult to directly measure during functional activities. Musculoskeletal models and simulations have become the primary methods by which to estimate in vivo ligament loading. Previous estimates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) forces range widely, suggesting that individualized anatomy may have an impact on these predictions. Using ten subject-specific (SS) lower limb musculoskeletal models, which include individualized musculoskeletal geometry, muscle architecture, and six degree-of-freedom knee joint kinematics from dynamic biplane radiography (DBR), this study provides SS estimates of ACL force (anteromedial-aACL; and posterolateral-pACL bundles) during the full gait cycle of treadmill walking. These forces are compared to estimates from scaled-generic (SG) musculoskeletal models to assess the effect of musculoskeletal knee joint anatomy on predicted forces and the benefit of SS modeling in this context. On average, the SS models demonstrated a double force peak during stance (0.39-0.43 xBW per bundle), while only a single force peak during stance was observed in the SG aACL. No significant differences were observed between continuous SG and SS ACL forces; however, root mean-squared differences between SS and SG predictions ranged from 0.08 xBW to 0.27 xBW, suggesting SG models do not reliably reflect forces predicted by SS models. Force predictions were also found to be highly sensitive to ligament resting length, with ±10% variations resulting in force differences of up to 84%. Overall, this study demonstrates the sensitivity of ACL force predictions to SS anatomy, specifically musculoskeletal joint geometry and ligament resting lengths, as well as the feasibility for generating SS musculoskeletal models for a group of subjects to predict in vivo tissue loading during functional activities.

Citing Articles

Effects of various load magnitudes on ACL: an in vitro study using adolescent porcine stifle joints.

Koh J, Mungalpara N, Kim S, Bedi A, Hutchinson M, Amirouche F J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):280.

PMID: 38711149 PMC: 11071243. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04744-6.


From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?.

Charles J, Kissane R, Hoehfurtner T, Bates K Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 97(4):1640-1676.

PMID: 35388613 PMC: 9540431. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12856.


The effect of modelling parameters in the development and validation of knee joint models on ligament mechanics: A systematic review.

Farshidfar S, Cadman J, Deng D, Appleyard R, Dabirrahmani D PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262684.

PMID: 35085320 PMC: 8794118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262684.


Consistent inconsistencies in braking: a spatial analysis.

Hammerberg A, Kramer P Interface Focus. 2021; 11(5):20200058.

PMID: 34938429 PMC: 8361576. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0058.

References
1.
Fleming B, Beynnon B . In vivo measurement of ligament/tendon strains and forces: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32(3):318-28. DOI: 10.1023/b:abme.0000017542.75080.86. View

2.
Imani Nejad Z, Khalili K, Nasab S, Schutz P, Damm P, Trepczynski A . The Capacity of Generic Musculoskeletal Simulations to Predict Knee Joint Loading Using the CAMS-Knee Datasets. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020; 48(4):1430-1440. PMC: 7089909. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02465-5. View

3.
Prinold J, Mazza C, Marco R, Hannah I, Malattia C, Magni-Manzoni S . A Patient-Specific Foot Model for the Estimate of Ankle Joint Forces in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 44(1):247-57. PMC: 4690839. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1451-z. View

4.
Nasseri A, Khataee H, Bryant A, Lloyd D, Saxby D . Modelling the loading mechanics of anterior cruciate ligament. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019; 184:105098. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105098. View

5.
Xu H, Bloswick D, Merryweather A . An improved OpenSim gait model with multiple degrees of freedom knee joint and knee ligaments. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 18(11):1217-1224. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.889689. View