» Articles » PMID: 26715999

Regulatory Mechanisms of Group Distributions in a Gregarious Arthropod

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Dec 31
PMID 26715999
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a patchy environment, how social animals manage conspecific and environmental cues in their choice of habitat is a leading issue for understanding their spatial distribution and their exploitation of resources. Here, we experimentally tested the effects of environmental heterogeneities (artificial shelters) and some of their characteristics (size and fragmentation) on the aggregation process of a common species of terrestrial isopod (Crustacea). One hundred individuals were introduced into three different heterogeneous set-ups and in a homogeneous set-up. In the four set-ups, the populations split into two aggregates: one large (approx. 70 individuals) and one smaller (approx. 20 individuals). These aggregates were not randomly distributed in the arena but were formed diametrically opposite from one another. The similarity of the results among the four set-ups shows that under experimental conditions, the environmental heterogeneities have a low impact on the aggregation dynamics and spatial patterns of the isopod, merely serving to increase the probability of nucleation of the larger aggregation at these points. By contrast, the regulation of aggregate sizes and the regular distribution of groups are signatures of local amplification processes, in agreement with the short-range activator and long-range inhibitor model (scale-dependent feedbacks). In other words, we show how small-scale interactions may govern large-scale spatial patterns. This experimental illustration of spatial self-organization is an important step towards comprehension of the complex game of competition among groups in social species.

Citing Articles

Avoidance behaviour toxicity tests should account for animal gregariousness: a case study on the terrestrial isopod .

Zidar P, Fiser Z Zookeys. 2023; 1101:87-108.

PMID: 36760970 PMC: 9848979. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1101.76711.


Sensitivity of density-dependent threshold to species composition in arthropod aggregates.

Pierre B, Quentin E, Geoffrey D, Nicolis S, Jean-Louis D Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32576.

PMID: 27576571 PMC: 5006165. DOI: 10.1038/srep32576.

References
1.
Liu Q, Doelman A, Rottschafer V, de Jager M, Herman P, Rietkerk M . Phase separation explains a new class of self-organized spatial patterns in ecological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(29):11905-10. PMC: 3718087. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222339110. View

2.
Bowler D, Benton T . Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005; 80(2):205-25. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793104006645. View

3.
Devigne C, Broly P, Deneubourg J . Individual preferences and social interactions determine the aggregation of woodlice. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e17389. PMC: 3045452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017389. View

4.
Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Nicolis S, Sole R, Fourcassie V, Blanco S . Spatial patterns in ant colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(15):9645-9. PMC: 124961. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.152302199. View

5.
Broly P, Mullier R, Deneubourg J, Devigne C . Aggregation in woodlice: social interaction and density effects. Zookeys. 2012; (176):133-44. PMC: 3335410. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.176.2258. View