» Articles » PMID: 16553306

The Principles of Collective Animal Behaviour

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Mar 24
PMID 16553306
Citations 218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, the concept of self-organization has been used to understand collective behaviour of animals. The central tenet of self-organization is that simple repeated interactions between individuals can produce complex adaptive patterns at the level of the group. Inspiration comes from patterns seen in physical systems, such as spiralling chemical waves, which arise without complexity at the level of the individual units of which the system is composed. The suggestion is that biological structures such as termite mounds, ant trail networks and even human crowds can be explained in terms of repeated interactions between the animals and their environment, without invoking individual complexity. Here, I review cases in which the self-organization approach has been successful in explaining collective behaviour of animal groups and societies. Ant pheromone trail networks, aggregation of cockroaches, the applause of opera audiences and the migration of fish schools have all been accurately described in terms of individuals following simple sets of rules. Unlike the simple units composing physical systems, however, animals are themselves complex entities, and other examples of collective behaviour, such as honey bee foraging with its myriad of dance signals and behavioural cues, cannot be fully understood in terms of simple individuals alone. I argue that the key to understanding collective behaviour lies in identifying the principles of the behavioural algorithms followed by individual animals and of how information flows between the animals. These principles, such as positive feedback, response thresholds and individual integrity, are repeatedly observed in very different animal societies. The future of collective behaviour research lies in classifying these principles, establishing the properties they produce at a group level and asking why they have evolved in so many different and distinct natural systems. Ultimately, this research could inform not only our understanding of animal societies, but also the principles by which we organize our own society.

Citing Articles

Swarm shepherding using bearing-only measurements.

Li A, Ogura M, Wakamiya N Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025; 383(2289):rsta20240145.

PMID: 39880031 PMC: 11779540. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0145.


Emergent collective behavior evolves more rapidly than individual behavior among acorn ant species.

Doering G, Prebus M, Suresh S, Greer J, Bowden R, Linksvayer T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(48):e2420078121.

PMID: 39576350 PMC: 11621464. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2420078121.


How synchronized human networks escape local minima.

Shniderman E, Avraham Y, Shahal S, Duadi H, Davidson N, Fridman M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9298.

PMID: 39468042 PMC: 11519520. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53540-7.


Foraging distance distributions reveal how honeybee waggle dance recruitment varies with landscape.

Palmer J, Samuelson A, Gill R, Leadbeater E, Jansen V Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1306.

PMID: 39394388 PMC: 11470012. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06987-9.


Common dolphin whistle responses to experimental mid-frequency sonar.

Casey C, Fregosi S, Oswald J, Janik V, Visser F, Southall B PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0302035.

PMID: 38669257 PMC: 11051594. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302035.


References
1.
Jackson D, Holcombe M, Ratnieks F . Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature. 2004; 432(7019):907-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature03105. View

2.
Couzin I, Krause J, James R, Ruxton G, Franks N . Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol. 2002; 218(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065. View

3.
Beekman M, Sumpter D, Ratnieks F . Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(17):9703-6. PMC: 55516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161285298. View

4.
Partridge B . The structure and function of fish schools. Sci Am. 1982; 246(6):114-23. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0682-114. View

5.
Theraulaz G, Gautrais J, Camazine S, Deneubourg J . The formation of spatial patterns in social insects: from simple behaviours to complex structures. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003; 361(1807):1263-82. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2003.1198. View