» Articles » PMID: 26714751

Development of a Cell Line from the American Eel Brain Expressing Endothelial Cell Properties

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2015 Dec 31
PMID 26714751
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A cell line (eelB) was developed from the outgrowth of adherent cells from brain explants of the American eel, Anguilla rostrata (Lesueur). EelB cells have been grown routinely in L-15 with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), undergone over 100 passages, and cryopreserved successfully. The cells from late-passage cultures (>45) were polygonal, formed capillary-like structures (CLS) on Matrigel, and stained immunocytochemically for von Willebrand factor (vWF) and for three tight junction proteins, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), claudin 3, and claudin 5. These results suggest that eelB is an endothelial cell line, one of the few from fish and the first from the brain. Despite this, eelB did not respond to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) with the induction of CYP1A protein. The cells from early-passage cultures (<20) had more varied shapes and did not form CLS on Matrigel. Only cells from early-passage cultures formed in suspension three-dimensional aggregates that had some cells expressing alkaline phosphatase and nestin. These cells are thought to be neural stem cells and the aggregates neurospheres. The emergence of endothelial-like cells upon the continued subcultivation of cells from early-passage cultures that had neural stem cells has been described previously for mammals, but this is a first for teleosts. Remarkably, cells from all passage levels were stained strongly for senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA β-Gal) activity.

Citing Articles

Development of a New Marine Fish Continuous Cell Line Derived from Brain of Red Sea Bream () and Its Application to Fish Virology and Heavy Metal Toxicology.

Luo X, Fu X, Zhang M, Liang H, Niu Y, Lin Q Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(22).

PMID: 38003142 PMC: 10668679. DOI: 10.3390/ani13223524.


Role and relevance of fish cell lines in advanced in vitro research.

Goswami M, Yashwanth B, Trudeau V, Lakra W Mol Biol Rep. 2022; 49(3):2393-2411.

PMID: 35013860 PMC: 8747882. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06997-4.


Form and Function of the Vertebrate and Invertebrate Blood-Brain Barriers.

Dunton A, Gopel T, Ho D, Burggren W Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(22).

PMID: 34829989 PMC: 8618301. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212111.


Development and characterization of a continuous cell line (EL) from the liver of European eel Anguilla anguilla.

Zheng Z, Yang J, Ge J, Chi H, Chen B, Fang Q Cell Biol Int. 2019; 44(3):808-820.

PMID: 31814207 PMC: 7028054. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11276.


Improving a fish intestinal barrier model by combining two rainbow trout cell lines: epithelial RTgutGC and fibroblastic RTgutF.

Drieschner C, Vo N, Schug H, Burkard M, Bols N, Renaud P Cytotechnology. 2019; :835-848.

PMID: 31256301 PMC: 6663964. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-019-00327-0.


References
1.
Castano A, Bols N, Braunbeck T, Dierickx P, Halder M, Isomaa B . The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 47. Altern Lab Anim. 2004; 31(3):317-51. DOI: 10.1177/026119290303100314. View

2.
Hinsch K, Zupanc G . Isolation, cultivation, and differentiation of neural stem cells from adult fish brain. J Neurosci Methods. 2006; 158(1):75-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.020. View

3.
Sun Y, Pollard S, Conti L, Toselli M, Biella G, Parkin G . Long-term tripotent differentiation capacity of human neural stem (NS) cells in adherent culture. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008; 38(2):245-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.02.014. View

4.
Devalle S, Sartore R, Paulsen B, Borges H, Martins R, K Rehen S . Implications of aneuploidy for stem cell biology and brain therapeutics. Front Cell Neurosci. 2012; 6:36. PMC: 3433681. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2012.00036. View

5.
Sansom B, Vo N, Kavanagh R, Hanner R, MacKinnon M, Dixon D . Rapid assessment of the toxicity of oil sands process-affected waters using fish cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2012; 49(1):52-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11626-012-9570-4. View