» Articles » PMID: 26707840

Comparing the Cost of Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries Assigned to Primary Care Nurse Practitioners and Physicians

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Dec 29
PMID 26707840
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study is designed to assess the cost of services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by nurse practitioners (NPs) billing under their own National Provider Identification number as compared to primary care physicians (PCMDs).

Data Source: Medicare Part A (inpatient) and Part B (office visit) claims for 2009-2010.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort design using propensity score weighted regression.

Data Extraction Methods: Beneficiaries cared for by a random sample of NPs and primary care physicians.

Principal Findings: After adjusting for demographic characteristics, geography, comorbidities, and the propensity to see an NP, Medicare evaluation and management payments for beneficiaries assigned to an NP were $207, or 29 percent, less than PCMD assigned beneficiaries. The same pattern was observed for inpatient and total office visit paid amounts, with 11 and 18 percent less for NP assigned beneficiaries, respectively. Results are similar for the work component of relative value units as well.

Conclusions: This study provides new evidence of the lower cost of care for beneficiaries managed by NPs, as compared to those managed by PCMDs across inpatient and office-based settings. Results suggest that increasing access to NP primary care will not increase costs for the Medicare program and may be cost saving.

Citing Articles

An unclear partnership: key questions about physician and advanced practice provider collaboration in primary care.

Martin E, Landon B, Spetz J, Edgman-Levitan S, Neprash H, Bates D Health Aff Sch. 2025; 3(2):qxaf006.

PMID: 39990729 PMC: 11842302. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf006.


Clinician Staffing and Quality of Care in US Health Centers.

Sun Q, Forman H, Stern L, Oldfield B JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2440140.

PMID: 39436649 PMC: 11581487. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40140.


Assessment of nurse practitioners' capacity of using the ABC/2 formula for intracranial lesion volume measurement.

Hu T, Yan Q, Wang X, Yue G, Yu P, Cheng X BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):641.

PMID: 39256738 PMC: 11389227. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02323-y.


Nurse Practitioner Care, Scope of Practice, and End-of-Life Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.

Kosar C, Thapa B, Muench U, Santostefano C, Gadbois E, Oh H JAMA Health Forum. 2024; 5(5):e240825.

PMID: 38728021 PMC: 11087831. DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0825.


State scope of practice restrictions and nurse practitioner practice in nursing homes: 2012-2019.

Ryskina K, Liang J, Ritter A, Spetz J, Barnes H Health Aff Sch. 2024; 2(2):qxae018.

PMID: 38426081 PMC: 10901290. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae018.


References
1.
Chien A, Rosenthal M . Medicare's physician value-based payment modifier--will the tectonic shift create waves?. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(22):2076-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1311957. View

2.
Mundinger M, Kane R, Lenz E, Totten A, Tsai W, Cleary P . Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000; 283(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.1.59. View

3.
Berenson R, Kaye D . Grading a physician's value--the misapplication of performance measurement. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(22):2079-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1312287. View

4.
Lenz E, Mundinger M, Kane R, Hopkins S, Lin S . Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up. Med Care Res Rev. 2004; 61(3):332-51. DOI: 10.1177/1077558704266821. View

5.
VENNING P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B . Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ. 2000; 320(7241):1048-53. PMC: 27348. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1048. View