» Articles » PMID: 20479030

The Effect of Different Attribution Rules on Individual Physician Cost Profiles

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 May 19
PMID 20479030
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Some health plans profile physicians on the basis of their relative costs and use these profiles to assign physicians to cost categories. Physician organizations have questioned whether the rules used to attribute costs to a physician affect the cost category to which that physician is assigned.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of 12 different attribution rules on physician cost profiles.

Design: Under each of the 12 attribution rules, a cost profile was created for the physicians in the aggregated claims database and the physicians were assigned to a cost category (high cost, average cost, low cost, or low sample size). The attribution rules differed by unit of analysis, signal for responsibility, number of physicians who can be assigned responsibility, and threshold value for assigning responsibility.

Setting: Four commercial health plans in Massachusetts.

Patients: 1.1 million adults continuously enrolled in 4 commercial health plans in 2004 and 2005.

Measurements: Percentage of all episodes assigned to any physician and percentage of costs billed by a physician that were included in his or her own profile were calculated under each rule. The cost category assignments from a commonly used default rule were compared with those from each of the other 11 attribution rules and the rate of disagreement was calculated.

Results: Percentage of episodes that could be assigned to a physician varied substantially across the 12 rules (range, 20% to 69%), as did the mean percentage of costs billed by a physician that were included in that physician's own cost profile (range, 13% to 60%). Depending on the alternate rule used, between 17% and 61% of physicians would be assigned to a different cost category than that assigned by using the default rule.

Limitation: Results might differ if data from another state or from Medicare were used.

Conclusion: The choice of attribution rule affects how costs are assigned to a physician and can substantially affect the cost category to which a physician is assigned.

Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Labor.

Citing Articles

Racial disparities in hospitalization and neighborhood deprivation among Medicare beneficiaries.

Poghosyan L, Liu J, Chen J, Flandrick K, McMenamin A, Porat-Dahlerbruch J Health Aff Sch. 2025; 3(2):qxaf010.

PMID: 39927097 PMC: 11803629. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf010.


Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults With Asthma and Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Work Environments.

Poghosyan L, Liu J, Turi E, Flandrick K, Robinson M, George M Nurs Res. 2024; 74(1):64-72.

PMID: 39330763 PMC: 11637959. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000780.


Racial Disparities in Lipid Screening Among Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Narrowed in Primary Care Settings Supportive of Nurse Practitioners.

Brom H, Poghosyan L, Nikpour J, Todd B, Sliwinski K, Franz T J Nurs Regul. 2024; 14(3):20-32.

PMID: 39206146 PMC: 11349328. DOI: 10.1016/s2155-8256(23)00110-2.


Racial and ethnic disparities in ED use among older adults with asthma and primary care nurse practitioner work environments.

Poghosyan L, Liu J, Turi E, Flandrick K, Robinson M, George M Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38559202 PMC: 10980142. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3972673/v1.


Primary care nurse practitioner work environments and emergency department utilization among older adults with substance use disorders in rural areas.

Turi E, McMenamin A, Martsolf G, Hasin D, Han B, Liu J J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023; 157:209285.

PMID: 38159910 PMC: 10922346. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209285.


References
1.
Greene R, Beckman H, Mahoney T . Beyond the efficiency index: finding a better way to reduce overuse and increase efficiency in physician care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008; 27(4):w250-9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.w250. View

2.
Robinson J . Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Q. 2001; 79(2):149-77, III. PMC: 2751195. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00202. View

3.
Dang D, Pont J, Portmoy M . Episode treatment groups: an illness classification and episode building system--Part II. Med Interface. 1996; 9(4):122-8. View

4.
Thomas J . Economic profiling of physicians: does omission of pharmacy claims bias performance measurement?. Am J Manag Care. 2006; 12(6):341-51. View

5.
Friedberg M, Coltin K, Pearson S, Kleinman K, Zheng J, Singer J . Does affiliation of physician groups with one another produce higher quality primary care?. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(10):1385-92. PMC: 2305845. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0234-0. View