Responding for a Conditioned Reinforcer or Unconditioned Sensory Reinforcer in Mice: Interactions with Environmental Enrichment, Social Isolation, and Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2015 Dec 23

PMID 26690588

Citations 4

Authors

Caleb J Browne

Paul J Fletcher

Fiona D Zeeb

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: Environmental factors influence the etiology of many psychiatric disorders. Likewise, environmental factors can alter processes central to motivation. Therefore, motivational deficits present in many disorders may be influenced by early life environmental conditions.

Objective: We examined whether housing animals in different environmental conditions influenced the ability of sensory stimuli to acquire incentive value and whether elevated monoamine activity altered responsing for these stimuli.

Methods: Isolation-housed (IH), pair-housed (PH), and environmentally enriched (EE) male C57BL/6N mice were examined in tests of responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CRf) or an unconditioned sensory reinforcer (USRf). The CRf was previously paired with saccharin delivery through Pavlovian conditioning, while the USRf was not conditioned with a reward. Following baseline tests of responding for the CRf or USRf, the effects of elevated monoamine activity were examined.

Results: At baseline, PH and EE mice responded similarly for the CRf or USRf. IH mice responded more for the CRf but exhibited slower acquisition of responding for the USRf. Administration of citalopram, a serotonin transporter blocker, or atomoxetine, a norepinephrine transporter blocker, decreased responding for the CRf and USRf in all groups. The dopamine transporter blocker GBR 12909 generally increased responding for the CRf and USRf, but further analysis revealed enhanced responding for both reinforcers only in EE mice.

Conclusions: Baseline incentive motivation is strongly influenced by the social component of housing conditions. Furthermore, environmental enrichment increased the sensitivity to elevated dopamine activity, while acute elevations in serotonin and norepinephrine inhibit incentive motivation irrespective of housing condition.

Citing Articles

Environmental enrichment improves social isolation-induced memory impairment: The possible role of ITSN1-Reelin-AMPA receptor signaling pathway.

Sowndharya S, Rajan K PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0294354.

PMID: 38241230 PMC: 10798460. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294354.

Serotonergic inhibition of responding for conditioned but not primary reinforcers.

McDevitt R, Marino R, Tejeda H, Bonci A Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021; 205:173186.

PMID: 33836219 PMC: 9635562. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173186.

Altered Behavior in Mice Socially Isolated During Adolescence Corresponds With Immature Dendritic Spine Morphology and Impaired Plasticity in the Prefrontal Cortex.

Medendorp W, Petersen E, Pal A, Wagner L, Myers A, Hochgeschwender U Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:87.

PMID: 29867388 PMC: 5954042. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00087.

Decreased Incentive Motivation Following Knockout or Acute Blockade of the Serotonin Transporter: Role of the 5-HT2C Receptor.

Browne C, Fletcher P Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 41(10):2566-76.

PMID: 27125304 PMC: 4987855. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.63.

References

Brenes J, Rodriguez O, Fornaguera J . Differential effect of environment enrichment and social isolation on depressive-like behavior, spontaneous activity and serotonin and norepinephrine concentration in prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007; 89(1):85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.11.004. View

Fone K, Porkess M . Behavioural and neurochemical effects of post-weaning social isolation in rodents-relevance to developmental neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 32(6):1087-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.003. View

Robbins T . The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978; 58(1):79-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00426794. View

Fletcher P, Korth K, Chambers J . Selective destruction of brain serotonin neurons by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine increases responding for a conditioned reward. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 147(3):291-9. DOI: 10.1007/s002130051170. View

Browne J, Soko A, Fletcher P . Responding for conditioned reinforcement in C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice, and Sprague-Dawley rats: Effects of methylphenidate and amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014; 231(23):4503-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3602-6. View

Han D, Gu H . Comparison of the monoamine transporters from human and mouse in their sensitivities to psychostimulant drugs. BMC Pharmacol. 2006; 6:6. PMC: 1448202. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2210-6-6. View

Jones G, Marsden C, Robbins T . Increased sensitivity to amphetamine and reward-related stimuli following social isolation in rats: possible disruption of dopamine-dependent mechanisms of the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990; 102(3):364-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF02244105. View

Mead A, Stephens D . Involvement of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunits in stimulus-reward learning: evidence from glutamate receptor gria2 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(29):9500-7. PMC: 6740469. View

Katz R, Carroll B . Intracranial reward after Lilly 110140 (fluoxetine HCl): evidence for an inhibitory role for serotonin. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1977; 51(2):189-93. DOI: 10.1007/BF00431739. View

10.

Bowling S, Rowlett J, Bardo M . The effect of environmental enrichment on amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity, dopamine synthesis and dopamine release. Neuropharmacology. 1993; 32(9):885-93. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(93)90144-r. View

11.

Cain M, Green T, Bardo M . Environmental enrichment decreases responding for visual novelty. Behav Processes. 2006; 73(3):360-6. PMC: 1702528. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.007. View

12.

Smith J, Neill J, Costall B . Post-weaning housing conditions influence the behavioural effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997; 131(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050261. View

13.

Solinas M, Thiriet N, Chauvet C, Jaber M . Prevention and treatment of drug addiction by environmental enrichment. Prog Neurobiol. 2010; 92(4):572-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.08.002. View

14.

Bardo M, Klebaur J, Valone J, Deaton C . Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous self-administration of amphetamine in female and male rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 155(3):278-84. DOI: 10.1007/s002130100720. View

15.

Hall F, Wilkinson L, Humby T, Inglis W, Kendall D, Marsden C . Isolation rearing in rats: pre- and postsynaptic changes in striatal dopaminergic systems. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998; 59(4):859-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00510-8. View

16.

Hall F, Humby T, Wilkinson L, Robbins T . The effects of isolation-rearing on sucrose consumption in rats. Physiol Behav. 1997; 62(2):291-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00116-9. View

17.

Economidou D, Dalley J, Everitt B . Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibition by atomoxetine prevents cue-induced heroin and cocaine seeking. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 69(3):266-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.040. View

18.

Shin R, Cao J, Webb S, Ikemoto S . Amphetamine administration into the ventral striatum facilitates behavioral interaction with unconditioned visual signals in rats. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8741. PMC: 2806927. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008741. View

19.

Galani R, Berthel M, Lazarus C, Majchrzak M, Barbelivien A, Kelche C . The behavioral effects of enriched housing are not altered by serotonin depletion but enrichment alters hippocampal neurochemistry. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007; 88(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.03.009. View

20.

Kelley A, Delfs J . Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991; 103(2):187-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF02244202. View