» Articles » PMID: 26686532

Physician Experiences and Preferences in the Treatment of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States: A physician Survey

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Dec 22
PMID 26686532
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sequential endocrine therapy (ET) is recommended for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and without visceral symptoms. Chemotherapy (CT) can be considered after sequential ETs, but is associated with adverse side effects. We assessed physicians' preferences and self-reported prescribing patterns for ET and CT in the treatment of HR+/HER2- mBC at community practices in the United States. Community-based oncologists/hematologists from a nationwide online panel who treated postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC were invited to complete a survey, blinded to the identity of study sponsor. Treatment preferences were collected by treatment class of ET-based regimens versus CT and by agent for postmenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC patients after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor use in the adjuvant or mBC setting. Among 213 physicians who completed the survey, 78% were male, 71% were based in small/intermediate practices (2-9 oncologists/subspecialists), 55% had >10 years of experience, and 58% referred to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines when treating mBC. Among first-line ETs, anastrozole was the most frequently used treatment (35%), followed by everolimus-based (EVE, 34%) and fulvestrant-based (FUL, 15%) therapy. After first-line ET, the most preferred second- and third-line treatments were ET monotherapy (48% and 39%), ET combination therapy (31% and 19%), and CT monotherapy (13% and 30%). Comparing EVE versus FUL, physicians preferred EVE in all lines but first line. Efficacy was the most important consideration for treatment choice. Physicians prescribed CT in early lines mainly because of visceral symptoms. This survey of treatment patterns for HR+/HER2- mBC in community practice suggested that after first-line ET, ET mono- or combination therapy was commonly used for the second- and third-line treatments and CT monotherapy for third- or later line treatments. CTs were used in early lines for patients with visceral symptoms.

Citing Articles

Identifying drivers of first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treatment choices.

Brufsky A, Maculaitis M, Kopenhafer L, Olsen P, Kurosky S, Arruda L Future Oncol. 2024; 20(29):2165-2177.

PMID: 38861295 PMC: 11508941. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2350294.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of ribociclib plus letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole in the United Kingdom.

Suri G, Chandiwana D, Lee A, Mistry R J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2020; 6(2):20-31.

PMID: 32685577 PMC: 7299496. DOI: 10.36469/9725.


Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.

Turner N, Finn R, Martin M, Im S, DeMichele A, Ettl J Ann Oncol. 2018; 29(3):669-680.

PMID: 29342248 PMC: 5888946. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx797.


Clinical implications of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 in breast cancer.

Yang F, Zhao Z, Zhao N Oncol Lett. 2017; 14(2):2393-2398.

PMID: 28789455 PMC: 5530001. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6410.


Physician experiences and preferences in the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the United States: a physician survey.

Lin P, Hao Y, Xie J, Li N, Zhong Y, Zhou Z Cancer Med. 2015; 5(2):209-20.

PMID: 26686532 PMC: 4735772. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.580.

References
1.
Ayanian J, Guadagnoli E . Variations in breast cancer treatment by patient and provider characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 40(1):65-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF01806003. View

2.
Dear R, McGeechan K, Jenkins M, Barratt A, Tattersall M, Wilcken N . Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (12):CD008792. PMC: 8094913. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008792.pub2. View

3.
Nooij M, de Haes J, Beex L, Wildiers J, KLIJN J, Becquart D . Continuing chemotherapy or not after the induction treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. clinical outcomes and oncologists' preferences. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39(5):614-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00869-9. View

4.
Abdolmohammadi A, Sears W, Rai S, Pan J, Alexander J, Kloecker G . Survey of primary care physicians on therapeutic approaches to lung and breast cancers. South Med J. 2014; 107(7):437-42. DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000134. View

5.
Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Chon U Cheang M, Voduc D, Speers C . Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(20):3271-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. View