» Articles » PMID: 26678416

Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Rat Limb Regeneration, a New Look at an Old Model

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Dec 19
PMID 26678416
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limb loss is a devastating disability and while current treatments provide aesthetic and functional restoration, they are associated with complications and risks. The optimal solution would be to harness the body's regenerative capabilities to regrow new limbs. Several methods have been tried to regrow limbs in mammals, but none have succeeded. One such attempt, in the early 1970s, used electrical stimulation and demonstrated partial limb regeneration. Several researchers reproduced these findings, applying low voltage DC electrical stimulation to the stumps of amputated rat forelimbs reporting "blastema, and new bone, bone marrow, cartilage, nerve, skin, muscle and epiphyseal plate formation". In spite of these encouraging results this research was discontinued. Recently there has been renewed interest in studying electrical stimulation, primarily at a cellular and subcellular level, and studies have demonstrated changes in stem cell behavior with increased proliferation, differentiation, matrix formation and migration, all important in tissue regeneration. We applied electrical stimulation, in vivo, to the stumps of amputated rat limbs and observed significant new bone, cartilage and vessel formation and prevention of neuroma formation. These findings demonstrate that electricity stimulates tissue regeneration and form the basis for further research leading to possible new treatments for regenerating limbs.

Citing Articles

Biophysical stimuli for promoting bone repair and regeneration.

Bai Y, Li X, Wu K, Heng B, Zhang X, Deng X Med Rev (2021). 2025; 5(1):1-22.

PMID: 39974560 PMC: 11834751. DOI: 10.1515/mr-2024-0023.


Experimental investigation on the reverse mechano-electrical effect of porcine articular cartilage.

Liu C, Zhao L, Dong H, Hua Z, Wang Y, Wang Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1485593.

PMID: 39963171 PMC: 11830689. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1485593.


Bioelectricity is a universal multifaced signaling cue in living organisms.

Zhang G, Levin M Mol Biol Cell. 2025; 36(2):pe2.

PMID: 39873662 PMC: 11809311. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-08-0312.


Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Shifts THP-1-Derived Macrophage Polarization towards Pro-Regenerative M2 Phenotype.

Bianconi S, Leppik L, Oppermann E, Marzi I, Henrich D Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000377 PMC: 11242703. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137272.


Biophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancer.

Murugan N, Cariba S, Abeygunawardena S, Rouleau N, Payne S Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023; 81(1):9.

PMID: 38099951 PMC: 10724343. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-023-05054-6.


References
1.
Ud-Din S, Sebastian A, Giddings P, Colthurst J, Whiteside S, Morris J . Angiogenesis is induced and wound size is reduced by electrical stimulation in an acute wound healing model in human skin. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124502. PMC: 4415761. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124502. View

2.
Reid B, Song B, Zhao M . Electric currents in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Dev Biol. 2009; 335(1):198-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.08.028. View

3.
Carlson B . Stimulation of regeneration in mammals: pipe dream or realistic goal?. Wound Repair Regen. 1998; 6(5):425-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1998.60504.x. View

4.
Balint R, Cassidy N, Cartmell S . Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012; 19(1):48-57. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0183. View

5.
Simon A, Tanaka E . Limb regeneration. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2013; 2(2):291-300. DOI: 10.1002/wdev.73. View