» Articles » PMID: 26634194

Acceptability of Physician Directed Academic Detailing to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: an Application of the RESPECT Approach

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 4
PMID 26634194
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In developing effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in at risk populations, a necessary first requirement is feasibility. This paper describes how the RESPECT approach to health education guided the conceptualization and implementation of physician-directed academic detailing (AD) to increase practice-wide CRC screening uptake.

Methods: Physician-directed AD was one intervention component in a large educational randomized controlled trial to increase CRC screening uptake. Study participants, primarily urban minority, were aged 50 or older, insured for CRC screening with no out-of-pocket expense and out of compliance with current screening recommendations. The trial was conducted in the New York City metropolitan area. Participants identified their primary care physician; 564 individuals were recruited, representing 459 physician practices. Two-thirds of the physician practices were randomized to receive AD. The RESPECT approach, modified for AD, comprises: 1) Rapport, 2) Educate, but don't overwhelm, 3) Start with physicians where they are, 4) Philosophical orientation based on a humanistic approach to education, 5) Engagement of the physician and his/her office staff, 6) Care and show empathy, and 7) Trust. Feasibility was assessed as rate of AD delivery.

Results: The AD was delivered to 283 (92.5%) of the 306 practices assigned to receive it; 222/283 (78.4%) delivered to the doctor.

Conclusion: The AD was feasible and acceptable to implement across a range of clinical settings. The RESPECT approach offers a framework for tailoring educational efforts, allowing flexibility, as opposed to strict adherence to a highly structured script or a universal approach.

Citing Articles

Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR).

Aujoulat P, Le Goff D, Dany A, Robaskiewick M, Nousbaum J, Derrienic J Trials. 2022; 23(1):144.

PMID: 35164836 PMC: 8842548. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06056-8.


Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Pond D, Mate K, Stocks N, Gunn J, Disler P, Magin P BMJ Open. 2018; 8(8):e021125.

PMID: 30121596 PMC: 6104761. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021125.


The use of external change agents to promote quality improvement and organizational change in healthcare organizations: a systematic review.

Alagoz E, Chih M, Hitchcock M, Brown R, Quanbeck A BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):42.

PMID: 29370791 PMC: 5785888. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2856-9.

References
1.
Smith R, Cokkinides V, Brawley O . Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(1):27-41. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20008. View

2.
Basch C, Zybert P, Wolf R, Basch C, Ullman R, Shmukler C . A Randomized Trial to Compare Alternative Educational Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Hard-to-Reach Urban Minority Population with Health Insurance. J Community Health. 2015; 40(5):975-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-015-0021-5. View

3.
Sequist T, Zaslavsky A, Marshall R, Fletcher R, Ayanian J . Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(4):364-71. PMC: 2683730. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.564. View

4.
Cornuz J, Ghali W, Di Carlantonio D, Pecoud A, Paccaud F . Physicians' attitudes towards prevention: importance of intervention-specific barriers and physicians' health habits. Fam Pract. 2000; 17(6):535-40. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.535. View

5.
Brouse C, Basch C, Wolf R, Shmukler C, Neugut A, Shea S . Barriers to colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing in a predominantly minority urban population: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(8):1268-71. PMC: 1447951. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1268. View