» Articles » PMID: 25850386

A Randomized Trial to Compare Alternative Educational Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Hard-to-Reach Urban Minority Population with Health Insurance

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Apr 9
PMID 25850386
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This randomized controlled trial assessed different educational approaches for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake in a sample of primarily non-US born urban minority individuals, over aged 50, with health insurance, and out of compliance with screening guidelines. In one group, participants were mailed printed educational material (n = 180); in a second, participants' primary care physicians received academic detailing to improve screening referral and follow-up practices (n = 185); in a third, physicians received academic detailing and participants received tailored telephone education (n = 199). Overall, 21.5% of participants (n = 121) received appropriate screening within one year of randomization. There were no statistically significant pairwise differences between groups in screening rate. Among those 60 years of age or older, however, the detailing plus telephone education group had a higher screening rate than the print group (27.3 vs. 7.7%, p = .02). Different kinds of interventions will be required to increase colorectal cancer screening among the increasingly small population segment that remains unscreened. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02392143.

Citing Articles

Primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs: a systematic narrative review.

Verbunt E, Newman G, Creagh N, Milley K, Emery J, Kelaher M Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024; 25:e12.

PMID: 38345096 PMC: 10894721. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423623000713.


Using the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change to Explain the Seeking of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Sharma M, Johansen C, Batra K, Dai C, Batra R, Hayes T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(16).

PMID: 37623139 PMC: 10454677. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166553.


Synthesis of Existent Oncology Curricula for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review With a Global Equity Lens.

Oldfield L, Jones V, Gill B, Kodous N, Fazelzad R, Rodin D JCO Glob Oncol. 2023; 9:e2200298.

PMID: 37141562 PMC: 10281448. DOI: 10.1200/GO.22.00298.


Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in Zuni Pueblo: Factors Associated with FOBT and Colonoscopy Utilization.

Edwardson N, Cartwright K, Sheche J, Pankratz V, Kosich M, Kanda D J Community Health. 2023; 48(4):565-575.

PMID: 36752868 PMC: 9906599. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-023-01196-7.


Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR).

Aujoulat P, Le Goff D, Dany A, Robaskiewick M, Nousbaum J, Derrienic J Trials. 2022; 23(1):144.

PMID: 35164836 PMC: 8842548. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06056-8.


References
1.
Smith R, Cokkinides V, Brawley O . Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(1):27-41. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20008. View

2.
Costanza M, Luckmann R, Stoddard A, White M, Stark J, Avrunin J . Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007; 31(3):191-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.04.008. View

3.
Bandi P, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Jemal A . Trends in colorectal cancer screening with home-based fecal occult blood tests in adults ages 50 to 64 years, 2000-2008. Cancer. 2012; 118(20):5092-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27529. View

4.
Basch C, Basch C, Wolf R, Zybert P . Distinguishing factors for asymptomatic colonoscopy screening. J Cancer Educ. 2012; 27(3):521-5. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0350-3. View

5.
Thorpe L, Mostashari F, Hajat A, Nash D, Karpati A, Weber T . Colon cancer screening practices in New York City, 2003: results of a large random-digit dialed telephone survey. Cancer. 2005; 104(5):1075-82. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21274. View