» Articles » PMID: 26610731

Effect of Hemodynamics on Outcome of Subtotally Occluded Paraclinoid Aneurysms After Stent-assisted Coil Embolization

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Nov 28
PMID 26610731
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms is preferred in clinical practice. Flow alterations caused by stents and coils may affect treatment outcome.

Objective: To assess hemodynamic changes following stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) in subtotally embolized paraclinoid aneurysms with residual necks that were predisposed to recanalization.

Methods: We studied 27 paraclinoid aneurysms (seven recanalized and 20 stable) treated with coils and Enterprise stents. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed on patient-specific aneurysm geometries using virtual stenting and porous media technology.

Results: After stent placement in 27 cases, aneurysm flow velocity decreased significantly, the reduction gradually increasing from the neck plane (11.9%), to the residual neck (12.3%), to the aneurysm dome (16.3%). Subsequent coil embolization was performed after stent placement and the hemodynamic factors decreased further and significantly at all aneurysm regions except the neck plane. In a comparison of recanalized and stable cases, univariate analysis showed no significant differences in any parameter before treatment. After stent-assisted coiling, only the reduction in area-averaged velocity at the neck plane differed significantly between recanalized (8.1%) and stable cases (20.5%) (p=0.016).

Conclusions: Aneurysm flow velocity can be significantly decreased by stent placement and coil embolization. However, hemodynamics at the aneurysm neck plane is less sensitive to coils. Significant reduction in flow velocity at the neck plane may be an important factor in preventing recanalization of paraclinoid aneurysms after subtotal SACE.

Citing Articles

Application of virtual deployment and hemodynamic simulation in treatment of a basal arterial dissecting aneurysm using flow diverter: A case report and literature review.

Zhu S, Zou R, Lu Z, Yan Y, Wu Y, Xiang J Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42545.

PMID: 40028598 PMC: 11872427. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42545.


A model with multiple intracranial aneurysms: possible hemodynamic mechanisms of aneurysmal initiation, rupture and recurrence.

Li W, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Yang X, Liu X Chin Neurosurg J. 2024; 10(1):13.

PMID: 38711139 PMC: 11071235. DOI: 10.1186/s41016-024-00364-5.


Microsurgical strategies for small unruptured dorsal internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Ahn K, Kim W, Kim Y, Joo S, Kim T J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023; 25(4):475-484.

PMID: 37828745 PMC: 10810722. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.05.008.


Improving the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics simulations of coiled cerebral aneurysms using finite element modeling.

Fillingham P, Romero Bhathal J, Marsh L, Barbour M, Kurt M, Ionita C J Biomech. 2023; 157:111733.

PMID: 37527606 PMC: 10528313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111733.


Hemodynamic Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Vertebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysms.

Jiang Y, Lu G, Ge L, Zou R, Li G, Wan H Front Neurol. 2022; 13:927135.

PMID: 35873788 PMC: 9296783. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.927135.


References
1.
Cebral J, Mut F, Raschi M, Scrivano E, Ceratto R, Lylyk P . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 32(1):27-33. PMC: 7964947. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2398. View

2.
Kakalis N, Mitsos A, Byrne J, Ventikos Y . The haemodynamics of endovascular aneurysm treatment: a computational modelling approach for estimating the influence of multiple coil deployment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27(6):814-24. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.915549. View

3.
Ogilvy C, Natarajan S, Jahshan S, Karmon Y, Yang X, Snyder K . Stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms: risks and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011; 3(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2010.002303. View

4.
Morales H, Kim M, Vivas E, Villa-Uriol M, Larrabide I, Sola T . How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(10):1935-41. PMC: 7965998. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2635. View

5.
Lin N, Brouillard A, Krishna C, Mokin M, Natarajan S, Sonig A . Use of coils in conjunction with the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2014; 76(2):142-9. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579. View