» Articles » PMID: 26589334

Localizing Pain Matrix and Theory of Mind Networks with Both Verbal and Non-verbal Stimuli

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Nov 22
PMID 26589334
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional localizer tasks allow researchers to identify brain regions in each individual's brain, using a combination of anatomical and functional constraints. In this study, we compare three social cognitive localizer tasks, designed to efficiently identify regions in the "Pain Matrix," recruited in response to a person's physical pain, and the "Theory of Mind network," recruited in response to a person's mental states (i.e. beliefs and emotions). Participants performed three tasks: first, the verbal false-belief stories task; second, a verbal task including stories describing physical pain versus emotional suffering; and third, passively viewing a non-verbal animated movie, which included segments depicting physical pain and beliefs and emotions. All three localizers were efficient in identifying replicable, stable networks in individual subjects. The consistency across tasks makes all three tasks viable localizers. Nevertheless, there were small reliable differences in the location of the regions and the pattern of activity within regions, hinting at more specific representations. The new localizers go beyond those currently available: first, they simultaneously identify two functional networks with no additional scan time, and second, the non-verbal task extends the populations in whom functional localizers can be applied. These localizers will be made publicly available.

Citing Articles

Within-Individual Precision Mapping of Brain Networks Exclusively Using Task Data.

Du J, Elliott M, Ladopoulou J, Eldaief M, Buckner R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060474 PMC: 11888310. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.25.640090.


Dynamic functional adaptations during touch observation in autism: connectivity strength is linked to attitudes towards social touch and social responsiveness.

Lee Masson H Mol Autism. 2025; 16(1):11.

PMID: 39966865 PMC: 11837348. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-025-00644-6.


COMMON AND DISTINCT NEURAL CORRELATES OF SOCIAL INTERACTION PERCEPTION AND THEORY OF MIND.

Miao Z, Jung H, Kragel P, Sadil P, Lindquist M, Wager T bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763925 PMC: 11702675. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.19.628993.


Sophisticated perspective-takers are distinctive: Neural idiosyncrasy of functional connectivity in the mentalizing network.

Zhang Y, Ma C, Li H, Assumpcao L, Liu Y iScience. 2024; 27(12):111472.

PMID: 39720521 PMC: 11667172. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111472.


Unveiling the neural dynamics of the theory of mind: a fMRI study on belief processing phases.

Golec-Staskiewicz K, Wojciechowski J, Haman M, Wolak T, Wysocka J, Pluta A Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39659259 PMC: 11665637. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae095.


References
1.
Tomaiuolo F, MacDonald J, Caramanos Z, Posner G, Chiavaras M, Evans A . Morphology, morphometry and probability mapping of the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus: an in vivo MRI analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 1999; 11(9):3033-46. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00718.x. View

2.
Frith C, Frith U . Interacting minds--a biological basis. Science. 1999; 286(5445):1692-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1692. View

3.
Amunts K, Malikovic A, Mohlberg H, Schormann T, Zilles K . Brodmann's areas 17 and 18 brought into stereotaxic space-where and how variable?. Neuroimage. 2000; 11(1):66-84. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0516. View

4.
Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R, Pickens D, Morgan V, Neighbor G . Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(5):711-20. DOI: 10.1162/089892900562417. View

5.
Haxby J, Gobbini M, Furey M, Ishai A, SCHOUTEN J, Pietrini P . Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science. 2001; 293(5539):2425-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1063736. View