Association of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agent Responsiveness with Mortality in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) responsiveness has been reported to be associated with increased mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. ESA requirement to obtain the same hemoglobin (Hb) level is different between HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. In this study, we investigated the impact of ESA responsiveness on mortality between both HD and PD patients. Prevalent HD and PD patients were selected from the Clinical Research Center registry for end-stage renal disease, a prospective cohort study in Korea. ESA responsiveness was estimated using an erythropoietin resistant index (ERI) (U/kg/week/g/dL). Patients were divided into three groups by tertiles of ERI. ESA responsiveness was also assessed based on a combination of ESA dosage and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A total of 1,594 HD and 876 PD patients were included. The median ESA dose and ERI were lower in PD patients compared with HD patients (ESA dose: 4000 U/week vs 6000 U/week, respectively. P<0.001, ERI: 7.0 vs 10.4 U/kg/week/g/dl, respectively. P<0.001). The median follow-up period was 40 months. In HD patients, the highest ERI tertile was significantly associated with higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.59, P = 0.029). HD patients with high-dose ESA and low Hb levels (ESA hypo-responsiveness) had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.24, 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.31, P = 0.016). In PD patients, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality among the ERI groups (P = 0.247, log-rank test). ESA hypo-responsiveness was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 1.75, 95% CI, 0.58 to 5.28, P = 0.319). Our data showed that ESA hypo-responsiveness was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in HD patients. However, in PD patients, ESA hypo-responsiveness was not related to all-cause mortality. These finding suggest the different prognostic value of ESA responsiveness between HD and PD patients.
Imaizumi T, Hasegawa T, Kosugi T, Nishiwaki H, Abe M, Hanafusa N Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2689.
PMID: 39838061 PMC: 11751488. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87456-z.
Comparative iron management in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review.
van Lieshout T, Klerks A, Mahic O, Vernooij R, Eisenga M, van Jaarsveld B Front Nephrol. 2024; 4:1488758.
PMID: 39664943 PMC: 11631840. DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1488758.
Atzinger C, Arens H, Neri L, Arkossy O, Garbelli M, Jiletcovici A Adv Ther. 2024; 42(1):471-489.
PMID: 39581908 PMC: 11782378. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03015-4.
Bini C, Marcellusi A, Di Rienzo P, Del Vecchio L Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2024; 11:175-190.
PMID: 39281665 PMC: 11393551. DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2024.3062.
Influencing factors of clinical efficacy of roxadustat among hemodialysis patients.
Wu W, Hu N, Li X, Di J, Zhou H, Niu H Ren Fail. 2024; 46(1):2308701.
PMID: 38345059 PMC: 10863536. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2308701.