» Articles » PMID: 26559671

Fast and Powerful: Biomechanics and Bite Forces of the Mandibles in the American Cockroach Periplaneta Americana

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Nov 13
PMID 26559671
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowing the functionality and capabilities of masticatory apparatuses is essential for the ecological classification of jawed organisms. Nevertheless insects, especially with their outstanding high species number providing an overwhelming morphological diversity, are notoriously underexplored with respect to maximum bite forces and their dependency on the mandible opening angles. Aiming for a general understanding of insect biting, we examined the generalist feeding cockroach Periplaneta americana, characterized by its primitive chewing mouth parts. We measured active isometric bite forces and passive forces caused by joint resistance over the entire mandibular range with a custom-built 2D force transducer. The opening angle of the mandibles was quantified by using a video system. With respect to the effective mechanical advantage of the mandibles and the cross-section areas, we calculated the forces exerted by the mandible closer muscles and the corresponding muscle stress values. Comparisons with the scarce data available revealed close similarities of the cockroaches' mandible closer stress values (58 N/cm2) to that of smaller specialist carnivorous ground beetles, but strikingly higher values than in larger stag beetles. In contrast to available datasets our results imply the activity of faster and slower muscle fibres, with the latter becoming active only when the animals chew on tough material which requires repetitive, hard biting. Under such circumstances the coactivity of fast and slow fibres provides a force boost which is not available during short-term activities, since long latencies prevent a specific effective employment of the slow fibres in this case.

Citing Articles

Comparative Morphology of the Extrinsic and Intrinsic Leg Musculature in Dictyoptera (Insecta: Blattodea, Mantodea).

Baumler F, Gorb S, Busse S J Morphol. 2024; 285(12):e70013.

PMID: 39648403 PMC: 11625980. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.70013.


A comparison of lower body gait kinematics and kinetics between Theia3D markerless and marker-based models in healthy subjects and clinical patients.

DSouza S, Siebert T, Fohanno V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29154.

PMID: 39587194 PMC: 11589150. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80499-8.


The Cocoon of the Developing Emerald Jewel Wasp (Ampulex compressa) Resists Cannibalistic Predation of the Zombified Host.

Catania K Brain Behav Evol. 2024; 100(1):1-10.

PMID: 39369688 PMC: 11878412. DOI: 10.1159/000540971.


Diverse material properties and morphology of moth proboscises relates to the feeding habits of some macromoth and other lepidopteran lineages.

Bast E, Marshall N, Myers K, Marsh L, Hurtado M, Van Zandt P Interface Focus. 2024; 14(2):20230051.

PMID: 38618232 PMC: 11008959. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0051.


A bite force database of 654 insect species.

Ruhr P, Edel C, Frenzel M, Blanke A Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):58.

PMID: 38200056 PMC: 10781734. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02731-w.


References
1.
Herrel A, Gibb A . Ontogeny of performance in vertebrates. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2005; 79(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1086/498196. View

2.
Dai Z, Gorb S, Schwarz U . Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 16):2479-88. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.16.2479. View

3.
Taylor G . Maximum force production: why are crabs so strong?. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1451):1475-80. PMC: 1690686. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1167. View

4.
Ache J, Matheson T . Passive resting state and history of antagonist muscle activity shape active extensions in an insect limb. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107(10):2756-68. PMC: 3362280. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01072.2011. View

5.
Lappin A, Jones M . Reliable quantification of bite-force performance requires use of appropriate biting substrate and standardization of bite out-lever. J Exp Biol. 2014; 217(Pt 24):4303-12. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.106385. View