» Articles » PMID: 26527317

Mutational Profiling of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer: Matched Pair Analysis of Targeted Sequencing Between Brain Metastasis and Primary Breast Cancer

Abstract

Although breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastasis with a notable increase of incidence, genes that mediate breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) are not fully understood. To study the molecular nature of brain metastasis, we performed gene expression profiling of brain metastasis and matched primary breast cancer (BC). We used the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel v2 covering 2,855 mutations from 50 cancer genes to analyze 18 primary BC and 42 BCBM including 15 matched pairs. The most common BCBM subtypes were triple-negative (42.9%) and basal-like (36.6%). In a total of 42 BCBM samples, 32 (76.2%) harbored at least one mutation (median 1, range 0-7 mutations). Frequently detected somatic mutations included TP53 (59.5%), MLH1 (14.3%), PIK3CA (14.3%), and KIT (7.1%). We compared BCBM with patient-matched primary BC specimens. There were no significant differences in mutation profiles between the two groups. Notably, gene expression in BCBM such as TP53, PIK3CA, KIT, MLH1, and RB1 also seemed to be present in primary breast cancers. The TP53 mutation frequency was higher in BCBM than in primary BC (59.5% vs 38.9%, respectively). In conclusion, we found actionable gene alterations in BCBM that were maintained in primary BC. Further studies with functional testing and a delineation of the role of these genes in specific steps of the metastatic process should lead to a better understanding of the biology of metastasis and its susceptibility to treatment.

Citing Articles

The epigenetic landscape of brain metastasis.

Powell A, Watson L, Luzietti L, Prekovic S, Young L, Vareslija D Oncogene. 2025; .

PMID: 40016470 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-025-03315-1.


Breast cancer brain metastases genomic profiling identifies alterations targetable by immune-checkpoint and PARP inhibitors.

Giannoudis A, Sokol E, Bhogal T, Ramkissoon S, Razis E, Bartsch R NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):282.

PMID: 39706915 PMC: 11662007. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00761-0.


Tumor-on-chip platforms for breast cancer continuum concept modeling.

Neagu A, Whitham D, Bruno P, Versaci N, Biggers P, Darie C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1436393.

PMID: 39416279 PMC: 11480020. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1436393.


Mutant p53 sustains serine-glycine synthesis and essential amino acids intake promoting breast cancer growth.

Tombari C, Zannini A, Bertolio R, Pedretti S, Audano M, Triboli L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6777.

PMID: 37880212 PMC: 10600207. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42458-1.


Discordance of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rosin J, Svegrup E, Valachis A, Zerdes I Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 201(2):161-169.

PMID: 37392328 PMC: 10361863. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07010-1.


References
1.
Chiang A, Massague J . Molecular basis of metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(26):2814-23. PMC: 4189180. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0805239. View

2.
Sharma A, Comstock C, Knudsen E, Cao K, Hess-Wilson J, Morey L . Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor status is a critical determinant of therapeutic response in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(13):6192-203. PMC: 4133940. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4424. View

3.
Maitra A, Molberg K, Albores-Saavedra J, Lindberg G . Loss of Dpc4 expression in colonic adenocarcinomas correlates with the presence of metastatic disease. Am J Pathol. 2000; 157(4):1105-11. PMC: 1850169. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64625-1. View

4.
Al-Shamy G, Sawaya R . Management of brain metastases: the indispensable role of surgery. J Neurooncol. 2009; 92(3):275-82. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9839-y. View

5.
Boogerd W, Vos V, Hart A, Baris G . Brain metastases in breast cancer; natural history, prognostic factors and outcome. J Neurooncol. 1993; 15(2):165-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF01053937. View