» Articles » PMID: 17616676

Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Status is a Critical Determinant of Therapeutic Response in Prostate Cancer Cells

Overview
Journal Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Jul 10
PMID 17616676
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB), a critical mediator of cell cycle progression, is functionally inactivated in the majority of human cancers, including prostatic adenocarcinoma. The importance of RB tumor suppressor function in this disease is evident because 25% to 50% of prostatic adenocarcinomas harbor aberrations in RB pathway. However, no previous studies challenged the consequence of RB inactivation on tumor cell proliferation or therapeutic response. Here, we show that RB depletion facilitates deregulation of specific E2F target genes, but does not confer a significant proliferative advantage in the presence of androgen. However, RB-deficient cells failed to elicit a cytostatic response (compared with RB proficient isogenic controls) when challenged with androgen ablation, AR antagonist, or combined androgen blockade. These data indicate that RB deficiency can facilitate bypass of first-line hormonal therapies used to treat prostate cancer. Given the established effect of RB on DNA damage checkpoints, these studies were then extended to determine the impact of RB depletion on the response to cytotoxic agents used to treat advanced disease. In this context, RB-deficient prostate cancer cells showed enhanced susceptibility to cell death induced by only a selected subset of cytotoxic agents (antimicrotubule agents and a topoisomerase inhibitor). Combined, these data indicate that RB depletion dramatically alters the cellular response to therapeutic intervention in prostate cancer cells and suggest that RB status could potentially be developed as a marker for effectively directing therapy.

Citing Articles

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer drivers SOX2 and BRN2 confer differential responses to imipridones ONC201, ONC206, and ONC212 in prostate cancer cell lines.

Purcell C, Srinivasan P, Pinho-Schwermann M, MacDonald W, Ding E, El-Deiry W Am J Transl Res. 2025; 16(12):7972-7982.

PMID: 39822524 PMC: 11733388. DOI: 10.62347/NBNQ6383.


The Emerging Predictive and Prognostic Role of Aggressive-Variant-Associated Tumor Suppressor Genes Across Prostate Cancer Stages.

Pedrani M, Barizzi J, Salfi G, Nepote A, Testi I, Merler S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39796175 PMC: 11719667. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010318.


Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer Drivers SOX2 and BRN2 Confer Differential Responses to Imipridones ONC201, ONC206, and ONC212 in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines.

Purcell C, Srinivasan P, Pinho-Schwermann M, MacDonald W, Ding E, El-Deiry W bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39257809 PMC: 11383667. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.28.610184.


The treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer.

Hu Y, Wang C, Liang H, Li J, Yang Q Med Oncol. 2024; 41(10):236.

PMID: 39210220 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02456-9.


Strategy of combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with other therapies and mechanisms of resistance.

Xue Y, Zhai J Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024; 17(7):189-207.

PMID: 39114502 PMC: 11301413. DOI: 10.62347/HGNI4903.


References
1.
Gao J, Arnold J, Isaacs J . Conversion from a paracrine to an autocrine mechanism of androgen-stimulated growth during malignant transformation of prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(13):5038-44. View

2.
Sage J, Miller A, Perez-Mancera P, Wysocki J, Jacks T . Acute mutation of retinoblastoma gene function is sufficient for cell cycle re-entry. Nature. 2003; 424(6945):223-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature01764. View

3.
Maddison L, Sutherland B, Barrios R, Greenberg N . Conditional deletion of Rb causes early stage prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(17):6018-25. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2509. View

4.
Giacinti C, Giordano A . RB and cell cycle progression. Oncogene. 2006; 25(38):5220-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209615. View

5.
Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari R, Ghafoor A . Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55(1):10-30. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.55.1.10. View