» Articles » PMID: 26523353

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Child Dog-bite Prevention in Rural China Through Video-based Testimonials

Overview
Journal Health Psychol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Nov 3
PMID 26523353
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Dog-bite injuries pose significant threat to children globally. School-age children are especially at risk because of their insufficient safety knowledge and cognitively immature tendency toward low perceived vulnerability to bites, and this risk is elevated further for school-age children living in rural China due to the large number of stray dogs, all potential rabies carriers, present in their communities.

Method: This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether viewing an educational video of testimonials would change safety knowledge, perceived vulnerability, and simulated behaviors with dogs among a sample of 280 third and fourth graders living in rural China. Participants were randomly assigned to view either an educational video of testimonials on dog-bite prevention (treatment) or an educational video of testimonials on drowning prevention (comparison). Safety knowledge, perceived vulnerability to dog bites, and simulated behavior with dogs using a dollhouse model were assessed both before and after exposure to the video of testimonials.

Results: Children who watched the educational video of testimonials on dog-bite prevention had increased safety knowledge, higher perceived vulnerability, and less risky simulated behaviors with dogs compared with the comparison group. Mediation analysis revealed that the intervention successfully changed children's simulated behaviors with dogs through greater safety knowledge and increased perceived vulnerability.

Conclusions: Results suggest the incorporation of testimonials into injury prevention programs has potential for broad global dissemination. The fact that both increased knowledge and heightened perceived vulnerability mediated changes in simulated behavior suggests the dual roles of knowledge and appraisal on children's injury-risk behavior.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of educational interventions for improving rabies prevention in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Janeaim N, Suwanwong C, Prasittichok P, Mohan K, Hudrudchai S J Educ Health Promot. 2025; 13():497.

PMID: 39850311 PMC: 11756695. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_238_24.


Establishment of an Animal Model of Dog Bite Injuries.

Huang D, Jia W, Li K, Liu Z, Liu L Int J Med Sci. 2024; 21(5):958-964.

PMID: 38617003 PMC: 11008484. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.94432.


Are children and dogs best friends? A scoping review to explore the positive and negative effects of child-dog interactions.

Giraudet C, Liu K, McElligott A, Cobb M PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14532.

PMID: 36570006 PMC: 9774011. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14532.


Parental Assessment of Benefits and of Dangers Determines Children's Permission to Play Outdoors.

Jidovtseff B, Pirard F, Martin A, McCrorie P, Vidal A, Pools E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36141739 PMC: 9517668. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811467.


Consequences of COVID-19 Lockdown on Children and Their Pets: Dangerous Increase of Dog Bites among the Paediatric Population.

Parente G, Gargano T, Di Mitri M, Cravano S, Thomas E, Vastano M Children (Basel). 2021; 8(8).

PMID: 34438511 PMC: 8392619. DOI: 10.3390/children8080620.


References
1.
Schwebel D, Morrongiello B, Davis A, Stewart J, Bell M . The Blue Dog: evaluation of an interactive software program to teach young children how to interact safely with dogs. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011; 37(3):272-81. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr102. View

2.
Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

3.
Shen J, Li S, Xiang H, Lu S, Schwebel D . Antecedents and consequences of pediatric dog-bite injuries and their developmental trends: 101 cases in rural China. Accid Anal Prev. 2013; 63:22-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.025. View

4.
Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, Welch N . Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001; 127(2):267-86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267. View

5.
Morrongiello B, Rennie H . Why do boys engage in more risk taking than girls? The role of attributions, beliefs, and risk appraisals. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998; 23(1):33-43. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/23.1.33. View