» Articles » PMID: 26518570

Genome-wide Association Study, Genomic Prediction and Marker-assisted Selection for Seed Weight in Soybean (Glycine Max)

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2015 Nov 1
PMID 26518570
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Twenty-two loci for soybean SW and candidate genes conditioning seed development were identified; and prediction accuracies of GS and MAS were estimated through cross-validation and validation with unrelated populations. Soybean (Glycine max) is a major crop for plant protein and oil production, and seed weight (SW) is important for yield and quality in food/vegetable uses of soybean. However, our knowledge of genes controlling SW remains limited. To better understand the molecular mechanism underlying the trait and explore marker-based breeding approaches, we conducted a genome-wide association study in a population of 309 soybean germplasm accessions using 31,045 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and estimated the prediction accuracy of genomic selection (GS) and marker-assisted selection (MAS) for SW. Twenty-two loci of minor effect associated with SW were identified, including hotspots on Gm04 and Gm19. The mixed model containing these loci explained 83.4% of phenotypic variation. Candidate genes with Arabidopsis orthologs conditioning SW were also proposed. The prediction accuracies of GS and MAS by cross-validation were 0.75-0.87 and 0.62-0.75, respectively, depending on the number of SNPs used and the size of training population. GS also outperformed MAS when the validation was performed using unrelated panels across a wide range of maturities, with an average prediction accuracy of 0.74 versus 0.53. This study convincingly demonstrated that soybean SW is controlled by numerous minor-effect loci. It greatly enhances our understanding of the genetic basis of SW in soybean and facilitates the identification of genes controlling the trait. It also suggests that GS holds promise for accelerating soybean breeding progress. The results are helpful for genetic improvement and genomic prediction of yield in soybean.

Citing Articles

Improving genomic prediction of vitamin C content in spinach using GWAS-derived markers.

Rameneni J, Islam A, Avila C, Shi A BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):171.

PMID: 39984864 PMC: 11844115. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11343-0.


Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.

Van der Laan L, Parmley K, Saadati M, Pacin H, Panthulugiri S, Sarkar S Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e70002.

PMID: 39972529 PMC: 11839941. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.70002.


Genome-wide association for agro-morphological traits in a triploid banana population with large chromosome rearrangements.

Rio S, Toniutti L, Salmon F, Hervouet C, Cardi C, Mournet P Hortic Res. 2025; 12(2):uhae307.

PMID: 39944997 PMC: 11817881. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae307.


The whole-genome dissection of root system architecture provides new insights for the genetic improvement of alfalfa ( L.).

Jiang X, Zeng X, Xu M, Li M, Zhang F, He F Hortic Res. 2025; 12(1):uhae271.

PMID: 39807345 PMC: 11725648. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae271.


GWAS analysis revealed genomic loci and candidate genes associated with the 100-seed weight in high-latitude-adapted soybean germplasm.

Bhat J, Yu H, Weng L, Yuan Y, Zhang P, Leng J Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(1):29.

PMID: 39799549 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04815-6.


References
1.
Albrecht T, Wimmer V, Auinger H, Erbe M, Knaak C, Ouzunova M . Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor Appl Genet. 2011; 123(2):339-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7. View

2.
Wang X, Li Y, Zhang H, Sun G, Zhang W, Qiu L . Evolution and association analysis of GmCYP78A10 gene with seed size/weight and pod number in soybean. Mol Biol Rep. 2014; 42(2):489-96. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3792-3. View

3.
Jiang W, Huang H, Hu Y, Zhu S, Wang Z, Lin W . Brassinosteroid regulates seed size and shape in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162(4):1965-77. PMC: 3729775. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.217703. View

4.
Browning B, Browning S . Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. Genet Epidemiol. 2007; 31(5):365-75. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20216. View

5.
Habier D, Fernando R, Dekkers J . The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2389-97. PMC: 2219482. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190. View